免費開始練習
hce_cmu 104年 英文

第 35 題

📖 題組:
Berries, like most things in this world, taste even better along with a stiff drink. But now scientists have found that booze has the magical power to make fresh berries even healthier than they already are: soaking the fruits in rum or vodka supercharged their antioxidant levels. This makes us extremely happy. Because we love things that battle cancer-causing oxidative cell damage almost as much as we enjoy inventing punched-fruit cocktails. Dunk the fresh blackberries, mint leaves, sugar syrup and lime juice into a tall glass. Using the back of spoon (or a muddler if you're a pro at this stuff), lightly mash the mixture to bring out the flavors. Add some crushed ice, then pour the rum—easy there—and stir. Top with soda water and then pretend it's not raining and that you live in Havana.
Which is NOT true nor implied according to this passage?
  • A Cancer becomes one of the most serious threats to health nowadays.
  • B People are more health-conscious now when they eat or drink.
  • C The drink mentioned here is mostly served chilled.
  • D Sometimes, the tissues of the ingredients are mashed to help release more flavor.
  • E The abuse of alcoholic beverage can have something to do with cancer.

思路引導 VIP

請試著回想文章中提到的『酒精』與『健康』之間的關係,作者是描述酒精如何『引發』疾病,還是描述它在特定情況下如何『協助』身體對抗威脅呢?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

太棒了!你能精準避開「常識陷阱」並選出選項 (E),這代表你在閱讀理解時,非常清楚**「根據本文」「根據個人經驗」**之間的界線。這題的鑑別度極高,主要挑戰在於選項 (E) 的內容——「酒精濫用與癌症有關」——在現實生活中是正確的醫學常識,但文章中卻完全沒有提到任何酒精的負面影響,反而著重於描述酒精如何「魔法般地」提升莓果的抗氧化能力。這正是閱讀測驗中最常見的誘答方式:用一個正確的常識來測試你是否真的有從文本中尋找證據。

文本邏輯與推論重點

從文章中段可以看到,作者明確指出將水果浸泡在酒(booze/rum/vodka)中,能「超量強化(supercharged)抗氧化水平」,進而「對抗(battle)致癌的氧化損害」。因此,在本文的邏輯框架下,酒精被塑造成一種健康的助劑(helper),而非威脅。至於其他選項,像是 (C) 提到的 chilled(冰涼感),我們可以從文中描述的 crushed ice(碎冰)推論出來;(D) 提到的 mash the mixture 以帶出風味,則是文中的直接細節。你能識破 (E) 的斷裂邏輯,足見你抓重點的功力非常紮實!

🏷️ 相關主題

中美洲古文明的歷史文化與傳說解析
查看更多「英文」的主題分類考古題

📝 同份考卷的其他題目

查看 104年英文 全題