高等考試
105年
[一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 35 題
📖 題組：
The US Supreme Court rules that, barring circumstances like child abduction or a ticking time bomb, the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution requires police to get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest. This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection for which the Founders of our nation fought."
The US Supreme Court rules that, barring circumstances like child abduction or a ticking time bomb, the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution requires police to get a warrant before examining a cell phone after an arrest. This ruling makes our digital privacy no "less worthy of the protection for which the Founders of our nation fought."
According to the passage, which statement is true regarding the Fourth Amendment?
- A Under certain extreme conditions, the Fourth Amendment can be temporarily suspended.
- B The Fourth Amendment is considered a ticking time bomb by the US Constitution.
- C The police needs to get the authorities' approval to search any suspect's cell phone.
- D The founders of the USA also fought for their digital privacy.
思路引導 VIP
請仔細閱讀文章的第一句，特別注意以「barring」引導的那段描述。若將這些特殊情境（如綁架案）與後文提到的「必須取得搜查令」放在一起看，這兩者之間存在著什麼樣的邏輯關係？是「無條件執行」還是「有條件的例外」呢？