免費開始練習
高中學測 105年 英文

第 41 題

📖 題組:
In Japan, a person’s blood type is popularly believed to decide his/her temperament and personality. Type-A people are generally considered sensitive perfectionists and good team players, but over-anxious. Type Os are curious and generous but stubborn. Type ABs are artistic but mysterious and unpredictable, and type Bs are cheerful but eccentric, individualistic, and selfish. Though lacking scientific evidence, this belief is widely seen in books, magazines, and television shows. The blood-type belief has been used in unusual ways. The women’s softball team that won gold for Japan at the Beijing Olympics is reported to have used blood-type theories to customize training for each player. Some kindergartens have adopted teaching methods along blood group lines, and even major companies reportedly make decisions about assignments based on an employee’s blood type. In 1990, Mitsubishi Electronics was reported to have announced the formation of a team composed entirely of AB workers, thanks to “their ability to make plans.” The belief even affects politics. One former prime minister considered it important enough to reveal in his official profile that he was a type A, while his opposition rival was type B. In 2011, a minister, Ryu Matsumoto, was forced to resign after only a week in office, when a bad-tempered encounter with local officials was televised. In his resignation speech, he blamed his failings on the fact that he was blood type B. The blood-type craze, considered simply harmless fun by some Japanese, may manifest itself as prejudice and discrimination. In fact, this seems so common that the Japanese now have a term for it: bura-hara, meaning blood-type harassment. There are reports of discrimination leading to children being bullied, ending of happy relationships, and loss of job opportunities due to blood type.
What is the speaker’s attitude toward the blood-type belief in Japan?
  • A Negative.
  • B Defensive.
  • C Objective.
  • D Encouraging.

思路引導 VIP

請仔細審視全文的敘事結構:作者在文中不僅列舉了血型信仰在日本社會的廣泛應用與有趣現象,也同時提及其缺乏科學實證及可能衍生的社會歧視(bura-hara)問題。當一位作者選擇「並陳事實與數據」而不帶入個人情緒化修飾語或強烈褒貶時,這反映出其對該議題抱持著何種性質的論述態度?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

各位同學看過來!恭喜你答對了,這代表你的邏輯判斷力比老師的髮膠噴霧還要精準! 【觀念驗證:為什麼是 Objective?】 這題考的是高中英文閱讀的高階技能——「作者態度(Author's Attitude)」。很多同學會被文末提到的 bura-hara(血型騷擾)誤導而選 Negative。但你看,作者在文中用了大量的客觀動詞:reportedly(據報導)、is reported tois popularly believed。作者像是一個冷靜的紀錄片導演,先講血型文化的流行,再講奧運與企業的應用,最後才帶出負面社會現象,全程平衡報導,沒有夾雜「我認為這很愚蠢」等主觀情緒字眼,這就是標準的 (C) Objective。

▼ 還有更多解析內容

📝 同份考卷的其他題目

查看 105年英文 全題

升級 VIP 解鎖