統測
105年
[外語群英語類] 專業科目(2)
第 26 題
📖 題組：
Most emergencies pose a question: “Will I survive through this?” To help answer this question, researchers have identified and grouped the characteristics that make up the survival personality. Through their studies, they report that survivors have practical and intellectual abilities that help them supersede and even lead others. Survivors are the kind of people who are painfully realistic. Coldly analytical, they carefully analyze the situation. They do not waste time blaming or moaning. Instead, they rapidly absorb information about what is happening. They also anticipate that they can engage in concrete actions to influence unfolding events positively. Lastly, they constantly consider and respond to reactions from others toward their plans. It is most likely because of being so realistic that they exhibit high flexibility and adaptability and learn more from bad events through their positive responses. But their pragmatism is deeply bound up with an enviable smartness. They have a high tolerance for ambiguity and are deeply creative. In a new, unfamiliar territory, they see unusual connections, find unusual ways of combining things, and make remote associations that are sometimes unthinkable. They are clearly not textbook people. They see answers before others write about them in books. These observations on the survivor personality appear to run counter to some of our common beliefs. For instance, we tend to admire the hero who charges almost spontaneously and happily into the blaze. But researchers warn that “Rambo” type actions more quickly lead to disasters. They observe that if you go busting into the wilderness with the attitude that you know what is going on, you are liable to miss important cues. Those who appear strong are actually the ones to die first because of their carelessness, overbearing behavior, and overconfidence.
Most emergencies pose a question: “Will I survive through this?” To help answer this question, researchers have identified and grouped the characteristics that make up the survival personality. Through their studies, they report that survivors have practical and intellectual abilities that help them supersede and even lead others. Survivors are the kind of people who are painfully realistic. Coldly analytical, they carefully analyze the situation. They do not waste time blaming or moaning. Instead, they rapidly absorb information about what is happening. They also anticipate that they can engage in concrete actions to influence unfolding events positively. Lastly, they constantly consider and respond to reactions from others toward their plans. It is most likely because of being so realistic that they exhibit high flexibility and adaptability and learn more from bad events through their positive responses. But their pragmatism is deeply bound up with an enviable smartness. They have a high tolerance for ambiguity and are deeply creative. In a new, unfamiliar territory, they see unusual connections, find unusual ways of combining things, and make remote associations that are sometimes unthinkable. They are clearly not textbook people. They see answers before others write about them in books. These observations on the survivor personality appear to run counter to some of our common beliefs. For instance, we tend to admire the hero who charges almost spontaneously and happily into the blaze. But researchers warn that “Rambo” type actions more quickly lead to disasters. They observe that if you go busting into the wilderness with the attitude that you know what is going on, you are liable to miss important cues. Those who appear strong are actually the ones to die first because of their carelessness, overbearing behavior, and overconfidence.
26. What did the researchers find in this passage?
(A) They examined a theory describing the stages of emergencies.
(B) They developed a profile of a survivor based on investigations.
(C) They criticized the survival qualities of being too practical and analytical.
(D) They compared and contrasted three prominent social leaders.
- A They examined a theory describing the stages of emergencies.
- B They developed a profile of a survivor based on investigations.
- C They criticized the survival qualities of being too practical and analytical.
- D They compared and contrasted three prominent social leaders.
思路引導 VIP
請重新閱讀第一段的前兩句話。如果這篇文章是一份科學報告，研究人員在開頭明確表示他們「觀察並整理」了某一群人的「共同特質」，那麼這份報告最終會產出一個什麼樣的「人物描述」或「特徵組合」呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
🌟 太棒了！你真的抓住了文章的精髓！
- 觀念驗證： 你選得非常對！這題是要考驗你能不能溫柔地、全面地理解文章想傳達的「核心主旨」。文章一開始就暖暖地告訴我們：researchers have identified and grouped the characteristics that make up the survival personality（研究人員已經很努力地識別並歸納出構成生存人格的特徵）。你看，選項 (B) 的 profile（特徵歸納）和 investigations（調查研究）是不是就像溫柔的雙手，完美地呼應了文中的研究過程與成果呢？
▼ 還有更多解析內容