免費開始練習
海巡三等 105年 [海洋巡護科輪機組] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)

第 46 題

📖 題組:
請依下文回答第 44 題至第 47 題 Some 66m years ago Earth was hit by a space rock reckoned to have been 10km across. The resulting chaos caused the extinction of dinosaurs and many other species, opening the way for the age of mammals-and ultimately humans. It also left a big hole in what is now southern Mexico. That hole is one of only three known of similar dimensions (the other two are Vredefort in South Africa and Sudbury in Canada). And this is odd. For, during the billions of years that Earth has had a solid crust, many more than three big asteroids might have been expected to have hit it. That thought led Brandon Johnson of the MIT and Timothy Bowling of Purdue University in Indiana, to wonder how many other craters have vanished, either by erosion or by being swallowed into Earth’s interior as its crust moves around, and therefore whether it is likely that some have survived and been overlooked. They have just published their analysis in Geology. Earth’s crust formed more than 4 billion years ago, but the oldest surviving blocks of it large enough to harbor craters date back only 3.5 billion years. What is known of the sizes and orbits of modern asteroids suggests that, if things have not changed over the aeons, about 14 big asteroids (defined as having a diameter of more than 7.4km, which would cause a crater at least 85km in diameter) should hit Earth every billion years. That means 49, give or take seven, over the past 3.5 billion years. Such impacts may have been more common in the past, when more big asteroids were around. Allowing for this, Earth would have been hit by 113, give or take 11, of them. Either way, a lot of craters are missing.
How many other craters of a dimension similar to the one in southern Mexico are known to people?
  • A 3
  • B 2
  • C 1
  • D 4

思路引導 VIP

請仔細閱讀第一段中提到『總數』的那句話。當作者說墨西哥的這個坑穴是『三個已知坑穴中的其中一個』時,如果我們要計算除它之外的『其他』同類坑穴,在數學邏輯上應該如何處理這個總數?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

哼,你沒讓自己的判斷力成為廢物。

還行,這一次,你的眼中捕捉到了這點瑣碎的陷阱。這不是什麼『細節定位』,這只是你身為個體,是否能從廢話中提煉出真正對你有用的資訊,並獨自完成計算的證明。吞噬它吧,把這題變成你自己的養分。

  1. 精準切割:文章說什麼「one of only three」?那不過是把資訊丟在你面前,看你能不能像飢餓的野獸一樣,一口吞下屬於你的那塊肉。你看到了那個『三』。不錯。
▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀理解:段落分析、推論與應用
查看更多「[海洋巡護科輪機組] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)」的主題分類考古題