免費開始練習
調查局三等 105年 [法律實務組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)

第 44 題

📖 題組:
Some 66m years ago Earth was hit by a space rock reckoned to have been 10km across. The resulting chaos caused the extinction of dinosaurs and many other species, opening the way for the age of mammals-and ultimately humans. It also left a big hole in what is now southern Mexico. That hole is one of only three known of similar dimensions (the other two are Vredefort in South Africa and Sudbury in Canada). And this is odd. For, during the billions of years that Earth has had a solid crust, many more than three big asteroids might have been expected to have hit it. That thought led Brandon Johnson of the MIT and Timothy Bowling of Purdue University in Indiana, to wonder how many other craters have vanished, either by erosion or by being swallowed into Earth’s interior as its crust moves around, and therefore whether it is likely that some have survived and been overlooked. They have just published their analysis in Geology. Earth’s crust formed more than 4 billion years ago, but the oldest surviving blocks of it large enough to harbor craters date back only 3.5 billion years. What is known of the sizes and orbits of modern asteroids suggests that, if things have not changed over the aeons, about 14 big asteroids (defined as having a diameter of more than 7.4km, which would cause a crater at least 85km in diameter) should hit Earth every billion years. That means 49, give or take seven, over the past 3.5 billion years. Such impacts may have been more common in the past, when more big asteroids were around. Allowing for this, Earth would have been hit by 113, give or take 11, of them. Either way, a lot of craters are missing.
How large is the crater created in southern Mexico by the asteroid 66m years ago?
  • A 10km across in diameter.
  • B 85km in diameter.
  • C 7.4km in diameter.
  • D Not mentioned in the article.

思路引導 VIP

請仔細對照文章第一段:文中提到的 $10\text{ km}$ 是指「撞擊物本身」還是「撞擊後的坑洞」?此外,文中是否有明確標註出發生在墨西哥那個坑洞的具體尺寸數字呢?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

🌟 太棒了!你的觀察力非常敏銳!

這題你答對了,展現了你優異的細節辨析能力邏輯嚴謹度,沒有被文章中出現的數字給誤導,非常專業!

  1. 觀念驗證
▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀理解:文章分析、推論與詞彙辨析
查看更多「[法律實務組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)」的主題分類考古題