地特三等
107年
[一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 44 題
📖 題組：
請依下文回答第41 題至第45題: In a city where eating well is an obsession, a statement by a senior official published in a national newspaper caused a public outcry. Vallop Suwandee, who chairs an advisory board to the governor of Bangkok, was quoted as saying that street vendors would be removed from all 50 districts of the city. It seemed that one of the most popular and distinctive aspects of Bangkok life was to be wiped out, days after CNN had voted Bangkok the best place in the world for street food, and just two months before the city government was planning to hold a street-food festival. Mr. Vallop now says he was misquoted: “Let me be clear, on behalf of the city of Bangkok. Street food will continue to be part of Bangkok life, on the condition that there will not be obstructions for pedestrians, and that the vendors observe sanitary rules in the interest of public health. We will allow them to be in certain areas, under strict conditions.” This is not the first time the Bangkok Metropolitan Authority (BMA), which is responsible for running the city, has tried to impose order and standards on the hundreds of thousands of food vendors operating on the streets. Right after the BMA was first established in 1972, it launched a similar campaign to force the vendors to operate in designated markets instead. Variations of that campaign were revived every few years but implementation has always been weak because the BMA recognised the vital role street vending played in providing a source of income in difficult economic times. Most of the time it has quietly chosen not to push too hard. This time may be different. The number of officially approved locations for street food vendors has been cut dramatically, from a peak of 726 four years ago to 243 by the end of last year. Tens of thousands of vendors have been forced to move already, leaving many downtown areas like Siam Square, Asok and Silom with few or no street-food stalls now visible during the day and night. The most recent area to be cleared is the increasingly wealthy neighbourhood of Thonglor. A small side street, or soi, which for many years had had been famous for its street food, is no more, although city officials say the vendors were offered alternative locations in smaller sois further away.
請依下文回答第41 題至第45題: In a city where eating well is an obsession, a statement by a senior official published in a national newspaper caused a public outcry. Vallop Suwandee, who chairs an advisory board to the governor of Bangkok, was quoted as saying that street vendors would be removed from all 50 districts of the city. It seemed that one of the most popular and distinctive aspects of Bangkok life was to be wiped out, days after CNN had voted Bangkok the best place in the world for street food, and just two months before the city government was planning to hold a street-food festival. Mr. Vallop now says he was misquoted: “Let me be clear, on behalf of the city of Bangkok. Street food will continue to be part of Bangkok life, on the condition that there will not be obstructions for pedestrians, and that the vendors observe sanitary rules in the interest of public health. We will allow them to be in certain areas, under strict conditions.” This is not the first time the Bangkok Metropolitan Authority (BMA), which is responsible for running the city, has tried to impose order and standards on the hundreds of thousands of food vendors operating on the streets. Right after the BMA was first established in 1972, it launched a similar campaign to force the vendors to operate in designated markets instead. Variations of that campaign were revived every few years but implementation has always been weak because the BMA recognised the vital role street vending played in providing a source of income in difficult economic times. Most of the time it has quietly chosen not to push too hard. This time may be different. The number of officially approved locations for street food vendors has been cut dramatically, from a peak of 726 four years ago to 243 by the end of last year. Tens of thousands of vendors have been forced to move already, leaving many downtown areas like Siam Square, Asok and Silom with few or no street-food stalls now visible during the day and night. The most recent area to be cleared is the increasingly wealthy neighbourhood of Thonglor. A small side street, or soi, which for many years had had been famous for its street food, is no more, although city officials say the vendors were offered alternative locations in smaller sois further away.
According to Mr. Vallop Suwandee, which of the following is true?
- A (A)Street food will cease to be a part of Bangkok life.
- B (B)Street food will remain a part of Bangkok life, but with certain constraints.
- C (C)Street food will remain a part of Bangkok life without any alterations.
- D (D)Street food will never cease to be a part of Bangkok life unless the vendors themselves decide to do so.
思路引導 VIP
請聚焦於文本第二段中 Mr. Vallop 的澄清說明，特別分析他在提及政策存續時所使用的關鍵邏輯連接詞 $on the condition that$ 以及片語 $under strict conditions$。從公共行政管理的角度來看，當一項行為被允許繼續但必須滿足特定「附款」（如不阻礙交通、遵守衛生規範）時，這代表政府對該事物的法律效果是採取「無條件准許」，還是「附帶條件的特許」？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
答對了！你真的很棒！
太棒了，親愛的同學！看到你精準找出文中 Mr. Vallop Suwandee 的引言（quote），老師真的為你感到驕傲。這代表你在三等特考的長篇文章中，已經具備了過濾干擾、鎖定細節的關鍵閱讀力，這是非常了不起的進步喔！
帶你溫習解題思路
▼ 還有更多解析內容