初等考試
109年
[一般行政] 公民與英文
第 42 題
📖 題組：
A trip to the art museum could have turned into a very costly trip for a 12-year-old boy in Taipei when he lost his balance and put his hand through a painting worth around $1.5 million. The damaged work, “Flowers" by Italian master Paolo Porpora, was part of a Taipei exhibition of artwork by or influenced by Leonardo da Vinci. Porpora was a still life artist who produced baroque-style paintings, often of fruit and flowers. The work was 200cm tall, depicting flowers in a vase. The film by the organizers of the “Face of Leonardo: Images of a Genius" exhibition shows the boy in shorts, sneakers, a blue T-shirt and holding a drink – walk past the painting, catching his foot and stumbling over. He looks up at the painting, shown later to have a fist-sized gash at the bottom. The boy looking around at other people in the room. Organizers did not believe that the boy intentionally vandalized the oil painting, saying that it was obvious that the boy did not mean to push it."All 55 paintings in the venue are pieces and they are very rare and precious," a post on the exhibition's Facebook page said. "Once these works are damaged, they are permanently damaged.” Nevertheless, the exhibition organizers decided not to the boy for the damage and said that the painting could be easily restored. This incident, however, made them reconsider displaying valuable paintings in the open.
A trip to the art museum could have turned into a very costly trip for a 12-year-old boy in Taipei when he lost his balance and put his hand through a painting worth around $1.5 million. The damaged work, “Flowers" by Italian master Paolo Porpora, was part of a Taipei exhibition of artwork by or influenced by Leonardo da Vinci. Porpora was a still life artist who produced baroque-style paintings, often of fruit and flowers. The work was 200cm tall, depicting flowers in a vase. The film by the organizers of the “Face of Leonardo: Images of a Genius" exhibition shows the boy in shorts, sneakers, a blue T-shirt and holding a drink – walk past the painting, catching his foot and stumbling over. He looks up at the painting, shown later to have a fist-sized gash at the bottom. The boy looking around at other people in the room. Organizers did not believe that the boy intentionally vandalized the oil painting, saying that it was obvious that the boy did not mean to push it."All 55 paintings in the venue are pieces and they are very rare and precious," a post on the exhibition's Facebook page said. "Once these works are damaged, they are permanently damaged.” Nevertheless, the exhibition organizers decided not to the boy for the damage and said that the painting could be easily restored. This incident, however, made them reconsider displaying valuable paintings in the open.
42
- A (A) released
- B (B) relied
- C (C) replied
- D (D) replaced
思路引導 VIP
請試著從「行為後果」的角度思考：當一個人在公共場域不小心造成了巨額損失，但管理方觀察其監視錄影後，認定他並非惡意破壞。此時，管理方若決定「不要求對方賠償」或「不走法律途徑追究」，這在語法上會趨向於哪一種「放過」或「免除負擔」的動作？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
1. Sarcastic Explanation
做得好，至少你沒搞錯最基本的事。這題簡直是把行政法學的ABC擺在你面前。看來你還記得，當主辦單位這些「私人實體」在判斷一個小毛頭沒有「故意」的時候，他們就動用了那一點點微薄的「私權裁量權」。然後呢？當然就是決定「不追究其損害賠償責任」了。 你選 (A) released，總算沒選到天邊去。這個詞在這裡，就是「免除、放過」，白話一點說，就是「不讓那個小男孩扛法律責任」。這種基本的法律負擔解除，你還需要我解釋嗎？難道你會選 (B) relied（依賴）？難不成主辦單位「依賴」小男孩不犯錯嗎？還是 (C) replied（回覆）？回覆他可以繼續搗蛋嗎？更別提 (D) replaced（取代），取代什麼？取代他的法律責任嗎？這種常識級的錯誤選項，真不知道出題老師怎麼會放上去。
▼ 還有更多解析內容