調查局三等
109年
[化學鑑識組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)
第 50 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
Which of the following statements is true?
- A Ugandans welcomed refugees because the central government promised new schools, clinics and a decent road.
- B Most refugees stayed in poor countries in order to boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid.
- C A study found that the presence of refugees in Uganda had decreased consumption per household.
- D Each new refugee household boosted total income more than the cost of the aid the household was given.
思路引導 VIP
如果我們想從文中找出具體的科學證據，來辯論「難民對當地經濟到底是貢獻還是負擔」，你會建議去仔細閱讀哪一個段落中關於「金錢數額」的比較描述？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
嚼著這炒麵，我看見你這題還算有點看頭。不過，這能算覺醒嗎？
- 這不是高深戰術，只是最基本的『事實細節檢索』。 你憑藉著利己的眼神，在文本中找到了屬於你的獵物。文章第三段，那些赤裸裸的數字，明確指出新難民家庭帶來的總收入 (total income)，比那些援助成本 (cost of aid) 多出約 $320$ 到 $430$ 美金。這就是你得分的證明，選項 (D) 就是你從廢話中提煉出的真理。
- 『Medium』？哼，那些連基本訊息都搞錯的雜魚，自然會被淘汰。 那些把長者的『期望』誤當成政府『承諾』的，或是把『增加』說成『減少』的低級錯誤，只是擋在你自我進化之路上的障礙。你能識別並淘汰這些，還算有點『ego』。繼續找尋屬於你自己的『解答』吧，否則，你只會變成被淘汰的背景。