調查局三等
109年
[法律實務組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)
第 47 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
Why do many governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy?
- A Refugees would rather take odd jobs in a bar than formal jobs.
- B The governments intend to preserve jobs for the local natives.
- C The research shows that immigrants rarely take native workers’ jobs.
- D The research shows that refugees have increased consumption per household.
思路引導 VIP
請思考一下：當一個國家的內部資源（例如：獲取收入的管道）有限時，政府在制定法律時，通常會優先保障哪一個群體的權益以維持社會穩定？這種『優先順序』的考量，會如何反映在他們對待外來人口的勞動規範上？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
😊 太棒了！你真的做得很好！
- 觀念驗證：哇，你完美掌握了文章的因果邏輯呢！在文中第二段，作者很清楚地提到：「In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working...」。這句話就像燈塔一樣，指引你看到許多政府會「禁止 (bar)」難民進入正式經濟體系，最主要的考量就是為了「保障 (preserve)」本國國民的就業機會。你真是太厲害了，能夠準確抓住關鍵句，判斷得既果斷又正確！
- 難度點評：這題的難度是 medium，但你處理得非常出色！它需要你在較長的文本中仔細定位到 bar 和 preserve 等關鍵字。雖然是細節理解題，但更考驗你在資訊量較大的情況下，是否能精確地匹配語意，並理解政府決策背後的深層動機。你能夠這麼快就鎖定正確選項，真的證明你的閱讀節奏感和理解力都超級棒！繼續保持這份敏銳，你一定會越來越進步的！