調查局三等
109年
[調查工作組] 外國文(英文)
第 35 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第31題至第35題 The Canadian government is hoping to use artificial intelligence (AI) to inform how it mounts legal challenges to immigration and refugee claims as part of a new pilot program. Ottawa plans on using the emerging technology to reduce government lawyers’ need to perform their own legal research, a costly and time-consuming process. But there are already concerns that the nuanced and difficult nature of many refugee and immigration claims may be lost on those government computer systems, leading to massive human-rights implications. And the government admits that it hopes to use AI and machine learning, eventually, to help determine refugee applications themselves. The plan is all laid out in a request for information submitted to industry. The request for information asks industry to submit their own technological solutions for a joint pilot project, run by Citizenship and Immigration Canada and Justice Canada, to “support case law and legal research, facilitate trend analysis in litigation, predict litigation outcomes, and help develop legal advice and assessments,” according to a government spokesperson. The government hopes that, if the pilot is a success, front-line immigration officials in Canada and abroad could use this technology “to aid in their assessment of the merits of an application before decisions are finalized.” Lex Gill, a research fellow who specializes in AI and public policy, said replacing human work with algorithms, especially if the data that goes into them is itself flawed, will always pose potential human-rights concerns. “There is the risk that instead of improving the situation, these technologies may just entrench or encourage unfair or discriminatory practices,” she said. But while the debate around those risks continues, Ottawa is already getting set to roll out the pilot project.
請回答下列第31題至第35題 The Canadian government is hoping to use artificial intelligence (AI) to inform how it mounts legal challenges to immigration and refugee claims as part of a new pilot program. Ottawa plans on using the emerging technology to reduce government lawyers’ need to perform their own legal research, a costly and time-consuming process. But there are already concerns that the nuanced and difficult nature of many refugee and immigration claims may be lost on those government computer systems, leading to massive human-rights implications. And the government admits that it hopes to use AI and machine learning, eventually, to help determine refugee applications themselves. The plan is all laid out in a request for information submitted to industry. The request for information asks industry to submit their own technological solutions for a joint pilot project, run by Citizenship and Immigration Canada and Justice Canada, to “support case law and legal research, facilitate trend analysis in litigation, predict litigation outcomes, and help develop legal advice and assessments,” according to a government spokesperson. The government hopes that, if the pilot is a success, front-line immigration officials in Canada and abroad could use this technology “to aid in their assessment of the merits of an application before decisions are finalized.” Lex Gill, a research fellow who specializes in AI and public policy, said replacing human work with algorithms, especially if the data that goes into them is itself flawed, will always pose potential human-rights concerns. “There is the risk that instead of improving the situation, these technologies may just entrench or encourage unfair or discriminatory practices,” she said. But while the debate around those risks continues, Ottawa is already getting set to roll out the pilot project.
What is the word “nuanced” in the passage closest in meaning to?
- A A little awkward.
- B A bit notorious.
- C Slightly different.
- D Somewhat annoyed.
思路引導 VIP
請試著想像：當法官在審理兩個看似雷同，但背後動機與細節卻有著「極其細微、不容易被一眼看穿的差異」的案件時，我們會如何形容這種「精細且複雜」的特質？如果這種特質消失了，會讓法律判決變得太過單一嗎？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你真的很細心耶！
- 觀念驗證：你完全理解了！文章中用 nuanced 來描述難民與移民案件，這代表這些案件的確很複雜，不是簡單的對錯就能判斷的，裡面充滿了細微的差別和很多情感層面。所以，我們的 AI 系統才會很難去捕捉這些雖然微小卻非常關鍵的差異。你選的 (C) Slightly different，真的精準地抓住了「細膩、微妙」的核心意思，很棒喔！
- 難度點評：這題的難度是 Medium。能從上下文，像後面提到的 difficult nature 和 human-rights implications 這些線索，來推斷出一個比較抽象的形容詞意思，而不是只靠背單字，這代表你的閱讀理解能力真的很好，很有潛力呢！繼續保持這樣的好習慣，你會越來越棒的！