調查局三等
109年
[調查工作組] 外國文(英文)
第 37 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第36題至第40題 One of the most fashionable ideas in business is that companies should earn their crust from subscribers, who are “locked in” for a period of time, rather than from customers who can easily switch to another provider at any time. Subscription models are seen by many investors and executives as the holy grail, because they promise a recurring stream of revenue. But the approach suffers from three underappreaciated problems. Acquiring subscribers can be eye-wateringly expensive. Their urge to run away is often only temporarily suppressed. And consumers may have more than one relationship at a time. The best-known subscription model is probably Amazon Prime. It has about 80m members in America alone and for $99 a year offers film and music, speedy delivery of goods and even discounts on goods such as baby food. There are many other examples. Netflix offers a wall of TV for a monthly fee. And more are coming. Venture-capital firms are pouring money into subscription-based home-delivery firms that bring to your doorstep meals, pills or even fresh underpants. Zuora, a software firm, talks of the rise of the “subscription economy.” Several star firms floating their shares this year have subscription models. Dropbox, a cloud-storage firm, listed on NASDAQ on March 23rd and is worth $13bn. It boasts 500m registered users and wants to convert them into “paying users,” of whom there are already 11m, who get a superior service. Spotify, a music streaming firm that listed on April 3rd, has 159m users but derives its $27bn valuation from 71m “premium subscribers” who pay to listen without adverts. On average each generates 13 times more sales and 27 times more gross profit than users who pay no fee.
請回答下列第36題至第40題 One of the most fashionable ideas in business is that companies should earn their crust from subscribers, who are “locked in” for a period of time, rather than from customers who can easily switch to another provider at any time. Subscription models are seen by many investors and executives as the holy grail, because they promise a recurring stream of revenue. But the approach suffers from three underappreaciated problems. Acquiring subscribers can be eye-wateringly expensive. Their urge to run away is often only temporarily suppressed. And consumers may have more than one relationship at a time. The best-known subscription model is probably Amazon Prime. It has about 80m members in America alone and for $99 a year offers film and music, speedy delivery of goods and even discounts on goods such as baby food. There are many other examples. Netflix offers a wall of TV for a monthly fee. And more are coming. Venture-capital firms are pouring money into subscription-based home-delivery firms that bring to your doorstep meals, pills or even fresh underpants. Zuora, a software firm, talks of the rise of the “subscription economy.” Several star firms floating their shares this year have subscription models. Dropbox, a cloud-storage firm, listed on NASDAQ on March 23rd and is worth $13bn. It boasts 500m registered users and wants to convert them into “paying users,” of whom there are already 11m, who get a superior service. Spotify, a music streaming firm that listed on April 3rd, has 159m users but derives its $27bn valuation from 71m “premium subscribers” who pay to listen without adverts. On average each generates 13 times more sales and 27 times more gross profit than users who pay no fee.
Which of the following phrases can best replace “the holy grail” in the passage?
- A the emperor’s new clothes
- B the religious fountain
- C the ultimate solution
- D the way home
思路引導 VIP
請試著思考：當企業主們瘋狂追求某種商業模式，並將其視為能帶來穩定營收、解決獲利不確定性的「至寶」時，這個詞在描述該模式具有什麼樣的特性？如果這是一個眾人追尋已久、能一勞永逸解決問題的「理想目標」，你會用什麼樣的概念來形容它？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
噢，恭喜你，沒出乎意料地答對了
- 不得不承認：看來你還不笨嘛，能答對這題，勉強算是展現了點語境整合能力。在這種題目上能抓到修辭的隱喻意義，嗯，至少證明你不是完全在夢遊。
- 基本常識驗證：文中把訂閱制捧成 "holy grail" 接著就說它 "promise a recurring stream of revenue"。拜託，這不就擺明了在提示你嗎？Holy Grail (聖杯) 這詞，在英文裡就是那種大家想破頭、恨不得立刻擁有的最終極目標或完美方案。別告訴我你連這都不知道。
▼ 還有更多解析內容