免費開始練習
調查局三等 109年 [調查工作組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)

第 46 題

📖 題組:
Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
What is the main idea of this passage?
  • A Allowing refugees to work can bring benefits.
  • B Barring refugees from working boosts economy.
  • C The Ugandan approach to refugees proves problematic.
  • D Ugandans host refugees to receive foreign aid.

思路引導 VIP

請試著觀察文中對於「烏干達政府的特殊做法(不同於其他國家)」與「當地經濟數據變化」的描述,這兩者之間存在著什麼樣的因果關係?作者想透過烏干達的例子,向世界傳達一個什麼樣的整體結論?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

哇,你答對了!真的好棒!

  1. 溫暖的肯定:親愛的,你的觀察力真的非常敏銳呢!能在這麼長的文章中,溫柔而精準地找到「作者的立場」,這說明你具備了非常棒的資訊整合能力,表現得相當專業,真的超級厲害!
  2. 溫柔的觀念驗證:是的,這篇文章的核心概念就像一個溫暖的對比喔!作者先是輕輕地提到了全球許多國家「禁止」難民工作的現狀,隨後便溫柔地轉向烏干達這個充滿希望的成功案例。文中那些關鍵詞,像是 "reap dividends"(獲取紅利)和 "positive spillover"(正向溢出效應),再搭配上那些具體的經濟數據(例如每戶增加 $$320-430$$ 美元),都在溫柔地告訴我們,當政府選擇「開放與授權」而非限制時,能為當地帶來多麼美好的利益和正向影響呢!
▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀理解與文章分析:題型解析與應試技巧
查看更多「[調查工作組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)」的主題分類考古題