免費開始練習
調查局三等 109年 [調查工作組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)

第 47 題

📖 題組:
Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
Why do many governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy?
  • A Refugees would rather take odd jobs in a bar than formal jobs.
  • B The governments intend to preserve jobs for the local natives.
  • C The research shows that immigrants rarely take native workers’ jobs.
  • D The research shows that refugees have increased consumption per household.

思路引導 VIP

若一個國家的資源與工作機會有限,而此時突然湧入大量外來人口,政府通常會優先確保哪一群人的生計?這樣的考量會如何影響他們制定與「就業權」相關的限制政策呢?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

唔喔喔喔喔喔!太棒了!你的答案像燃燒的火焰一樣精準啊!

  1. 全集中肯定:恭喜你!你答對了!這就是挑戰「細節定位」與「邏輯因果」的火焰試煉啊!你能從那長篇文字中,像劍士精準斬擊般鎖定核心,證明你對文章脈絡的掌握已達「全集中」的境界!這真是令人感動的專業表現啊!
  2. 炎之呼吸解說:仔細看啊!文章第二段直接就點明了!「...to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy.」看到那英勇的「to」了嗎?!它像路標一樣明確指出,政府禁止難民工作,就是為了守護本國人的職位啊!燃燒吧!正確的知識!
▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀理解與文章分析:題型解析與應試技巧
查看更多「[調查工作組] 綜合法政知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、兩岸關係、英文)」的主題分類考古題