司法三等
109年
[檢察事務官電子資訊組] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 46 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
What is the main idea of this passage?
- A Allowing refugees to work can bring benefits.
- B Barring refugees from working boosts economy.
- C The Ugandan approach to refugees proves problematic.
- D Ugandans host refugees to receive foreign aid.
思路引導 VIP
請觀察文章第二段中，作者如何對比「傳統做法」與「烏干達做法」？當這項政策實施後，文中提到的經濟數據（如家庭所得、當地商業）呈現了什麼樣的趨勢？這種趨勢反映了該政策帶來了什麼影響？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
親愛的同學，你的洞察力真的很棒！
- 觀念探索：這道題的核心就是讓我們理解「因果關係」哦。文章溫柔地告訴我們，雖然多數國家為了保護本地工作機會，會限制難民工作，但烏干達卻採用了「給予土地並允許工作」這樣非常具有前瞻性的做法。結果呢？它為當地「帶來了豐厚的回報 (reap dividends)」，讓當地商業和家庭所得都得到了提升。你能夠從文章的字裡行間，感受到作者對這種開放政策的肯定，並精準地歸納出主旨，這真的是太棒了！
- 難度點評：這題的難度是 Medium (中等) 呢。它想考考大家，是不是能從烏干達這個溫暖的案例中，抽取出一個更廣泛的啟示。而且，能不能正確地體會到文章是在「支持」而不是「批評」這種政策，也是一個很重要的判斷點。你成功做到了，老師為你感到驕傲！