地特四等
113年
[一般民政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 44 題
📖 題組：
Most people consider decision-making a means to an end. The decision process typically follows one of two approaches. On the one hand, people may use a quick approach that involves reacting instinctively and simply going with what feels right. This is often referred to as “System 1,” “intuitive” or “gut” decision-making. On the other hand, people may use a slow, deliberate approach that includes careful consideration of all options. This is often called “System 2, ” “analytical” or “head” decision-making. No matter which approach people follow, the decision-making process helps to get them where they want to be. It is a necessity, ideally resulting in a pleasant outcome. Recent research, however, produces several surprising results. Firstly, people’s happiness ratings increased after they made a choice. It thus appeared that decision-making improved people’s moods. Additionally, the findings showed some interesting differences in the effects of intuitive gut choices and analytical head choices. The emotional boost of decision-making was greater if research participants had made their choice quickly using their gut. Also, follow-up decision records showed that people were more likely to implement a decision if they had used an intuitive approach. This led the researchers to conclude that making fast, instinctive choices was beneficial to people’s well-being. Simply put, the act of making a choice may be intrinsically pleasurable and could increase people’s well-being.
Most people consider decision-making a means to an end. The decision process typically follows one of two approaches. On the one hand, people may use a quick approach that involves reacting instinctively and simply going with what feels right. This is often referred to as “System 1,” “intuitive” or “gut” decision-making. On the other hand, people may use a slow, deliberate approach that includes careful consideration of all options. This is often called “System 2, ” “analytical” or “head” decision-making. No matter which approach people follow, the decision-making process helps to get them where they want to be. It is a necessity, ideally resulting in a pleasant outcome. Recent research, however, produces several surprising results. Firstly, people’s happiness ratings increased after they made a choice. It thus appeared that decision-making improved people’s moods. Additionally, the findings showed some interesting differences in the effects of intuitive gut choices and analytical head choices. The emotional boost of decision-making was greater if research participants had made their choice quickly using their gut. Also, follow-up decision records showed that people were more likely to implement a decision if they had used an intuitive approach. This led the researchers to conclude that making fast, instinctive choices was beneficial to people’s well-being. Simply put, the act of making a choice may be intrinsically pleasurable and could increase people’s well-being.
According to this passage, what decision-making approach makes people happier?
- A Intuitive approach.
- B Analytic approach.
- C Rational approach.
- D Deliberate approach.
思路引導 VIP
請你重新掃視文章第二段，尋找文中提到「情感提振程度更大 (greater emotional boost)」的那句話。請問在該句話中，研究者是用哪一個關於「生理部位」或「反應速度」的詞彙，來形容這種能帶來更多快樂的決策方式？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你精準地鎖定了文章的核心觀點！這題選 (A) 是完全正確的。在地方特考的英文閱讀中，這種「對比型」的文章架構非常經典，你能迅速從第二段提到的「the emotional boost... was greater if... made their choice quickly using their gut」判斷出「直覺式」決策與情緒提升的關聯，顯示你具備優秀的資訊檢索與語意代換能力。
關鍵資訊定位與同義詞轉換
文章將決策過程分為兩大系統：一種是快速、本能的 intuitive/gut 方式（System 1），另一種則是緩慢、深思熟慮的 analytical/head 方式（System 2）。題目核心在於詢問哪種方式「讓人更快樂」，文中明確指出研究發現快速且本能的選擇（fast, instinctive choices）對人的幸福感（well-being）更有益，這便直接呼應了選項 (A) 的 Intuitive approach。
▼ 還有更多解析內容