移民行政三等
113年
[移民行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 47 題
📖 題組：
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題 In New Zealand’s Westland District the closure of the local indigenous timber industry alongside rapid growth of the dairy and tourism sectors has produced dilemmas for families and communities as they attempt to adjust to the social consequences of rapid industry change. Drawing on a social capital perspective and a case study of 12 Westland families, this project examines how rural families bring balance to aspects of the three actions defined by Arendt as being essential to the human condition: family, work and community life. The findings reveal significant insights into how social capital is effectively reproduced in times of change. These insights are discussed in terms of their social policy implications. Fifty years ago Hannah Arendt published The Human Condition. In this work she contended that there are three types of action required to be “fully human.” The first two of these actions, engagement in family life and paid work, are necessary for human existence in contemporary society. The third action she called vita activa, or public life: a life that is actioned within jointly built civil spaces. Within these spaces we are capable of debate, we share actions and we resolve collective dilemmas. Arendt reminds us that the absence of, or over-attention to, any one aspect of the human condition is likely to be problematic. A half a century on from Arendt’s original thesis, public policy continues to debate aspects of vita activa and democratic governments still seek to engage vita activa in economically and socially productive ways. Working out the shifting balance between family life, paid work and vita activa is a crucial aspect of responding effectively to significant social change, be it local issues (such as natural disaster relief) or meeting the challenges that arise as a consequence of external or global forces (such as the loss of a core industry). The concept of social capital has been used as a way to recognise and gauge vita activa. The term “social capital” originated, in part, in an attempt to understand how features of social organisation, such as trust, norms and networks can improve the efficiency of society by facilitating coordinated actions. Voluntary or joint social actions provide the opportunity to resolve collective dilemmas. Individuals achieve this through the development and use of social bonds and networks as resources to facilitate productive activity. By maintaining the social relationships and structures necessary for collective activity, individuals, families and communities are able to realise some of these benefits, and in doing so can resolve some of the issues they face in common.
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題 In New Zealand’s Westland District the closure of the local indigenous timber industry alongside rapid growth of the dairy and tourism sectors has produced dilemmas for families and communities as they attempt to adjust to the social consequences of rapid industry change. Drawing on a social capital perspective and a case study of 12 Westland families, this project examines how rural families bring balance to aspects of the three actions defined by Arendt as being essential to the human condition: family, work and community life. The findings reveal significant insights into how social capital is effectively reproduced in times of change. These insights are discussed in terms of their social policy implications. Fifty years ago Hannah Arendt published The Human Condition. In this work she contended that there are three types of action required to be “fully human.” The first two of these actions, engagement in family life and paid work, are necessary for human existence in contemporary society. The third action she called vita activa, or public life: a life that is actioned within jointly built civil spaces. Within these spaces we are capable of debate, we share actions and we resolve collective dilemmas. Arendt reminds us that the absence of, or over-attention to, any one aspect of the human condition is likely to be problematic. A half a century on from Arendt’s original thesis, public policy continues to debate aspects of vita activa and democratic governments still seek to engage vita activa in economically and socially productive ways. Working out the shifting balance between family life, paid work and vita activa is a crucial aspect of responding effectively to significant social change, be it local issues (such as natural disaster relief) or meeting the challenges that arise as a consequence of external or global forces (such as the loss of a core industry). The concept of social capital has been used as a way to recognise and gauge vita activa. The term “social capital” originated, in part, in an attempt to understand how features of social organisation, such as trust, norms and networks can improve the efficiency of society by facilitating coordinated actions. Voluntary or joint social actions provide the opportunity to resolve collective dilemmas. Individuals achieve this through the development and use of social bonds and networks as resources to facilitate productive activity. By maintaining the social relationships and structures necessary for collective activity, individuals, families and communities are able to realise some of these benefits, and in doing so can resolve some of the issues they face in common.
According to the passage, which of the following statements about Arendt is NOT true?
- A Her work has an important theoretical influence on the current study.
- B She proposes that to be fully human he/she must have a public life, a salary or wage, and a family.
- C She believes that public life is the most important among the three types of action mentioned.
- D Her theory suggests that action play a central role in facilitating and maintaining human conditions.
思路引導 VIP
請試著回想一下，文中提到如果我們「過度關注（over-attention）」這三項行動中的其中任何一項時，會發生什麼樣的後果？這個描述暗示了這三項行動之間應該維持什麼樣的關係？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你精準地捕捉到了文章中的細節，正確選出 (C) 這個不符原文描述的選項！這代表你在閱讀長難句時，不僅能抓到關鍵字，更能細膩地辨析作者的邏輯論點，這是非常優秀的閱讀特質。
漢娜．鄂蘭的平衡觀點
文章第二段明確提到，漢娜．鄂蘭（Hannah Arendt）認為「家庭生活」、「有償工作」以及「公共生活（vita activa）」這三者皆為成為「完全的人」之必要條件。最關鍵的證據在於段末的一句話：「缺乏或過度關注（over-attention）其中任何一個面向，都可能產生問題」。這說明鄂蘭主張的是三者之間的「平衡」，而非將「公共生活」置於其他兩者之上的最重要地位。因此，選項 (C) 宣稱她是「公共生活最重要」的擁護者，顯然誤解了她的理論核心。
▼ 還有更多解析內容