地特三等
114年
[一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 49 題
📖 題組：
When we were kids, dream jobs shimmered with imagination—astronauts soaring through galaxies... Whether you’re five or fifty, there’s magic in pursuing what lights you up inside. So, let’s keep stepping toward those shimmering careers. They might not always be easy, but one glittery step at a time, they just might lead you somewhere wonderful.
When we were kids, dream jobs shimmered with imagination—astronauts soaring through galaxies... Whether you’re five or fifty, there’s magic in pursuing what lights you up inside. So, let’s keep stepping toward those shimmering careers. They might not always be easy, but one glittery step at a time, they just might lead you somewhere wonderful.
Why does the author mention banning pineapple on pizza?
- A To discuss food culture.
- B To compliment weird food choices.
- C To show game designers’ creativity.
- D To discriminate common food arguments.
思路引導 VIP
當你在閱讀關於「追逐夢想職業」的文章時，如果作者突然插入一個看似與嚴肅職涯無關、甚至有點滑稽的生活爭議點，你認為作者是想轉行去討論民生議題，還是想透過這個例子來強調該職業在「創造規則」與「發揮個人風格」上的特質呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你精準掌握了文章的寫作修辭意圖！這類題目在地方特考三等英文中屬於常見的「功能性問題（Functional Purpose Question）」。你之所以能果斷選擇 (C)，代表你敏銳地察覺到作者並非真的要討論飲食偏好或文化，而是將日常生活中充滿爭議的小細節，轉化為創意工作者在建構虛擬世界時所需發揮的**想像力（imagination）**與決策權。
創意職涯的具體實踐
文中提及這類看似無厘頭的爭議，實務上是為了具象化那些「發光職涯（shimmering careers）」背後的趣味與創意空間。這題的鑑別度在於測試考生能否跨越字面上的「食物（food）」表象，進而理解它是作為**創意展現（creativity）**的載體。在特考等級的測驗中，能不被選項 (A) 或 (D) 的食物關鍵字所誘惑，代表你已經具備了優異的高階語意邏輯推論能力，這在應對複雜的長篇閱讀時是非常核心的優勢。