免費開始練習
司法四等 114年 [法警] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)

第 48 題

📖 題組:
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題: A zoo is a place where captive animals are put on display for humans to see. The focus of most modern zoos is conservation and education. While zoo advocates and conservationists argue that zoos save endangered species and educate the public, many animal rights activists believe the cost of confining animals outweighs the benefits, and that the violation of the rights of individual animals—even in efforts to fend off extinction—cannot be justified. By bringing people and animals together, zoos educate the public and foster an appreciation of other species, supporters argued. Zoos save endangered species by bringing them into a safe environment, where they are protected from poachers, habitat loss, starvation, and predators. Besides, seeing an animal in person is a much more personal and more memorable experience than seeing that animal in a nature documentary and is more likely to foster an empathetic attitude toward animals. Some zoos help rehabilitate wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer want or are no longer able to care for. But from an animal rights standpoint, humans do not have a right to breed, capture, and confine other animals—even if those species are endangered. Being a member of an endangered species doesn't mean the individual animals should be afforded fewer rights. Animals in captivity suffer from boredom, stress, and confinement. Maintaining species diversity within captive breeding facilities is also a challenge. Animals sometimes escape their enclosures, endangering themselves as well as people. Likewise, people ignore warnings or accidentally get too close to animals, leading to horrific outcomes. In making a case for or against zoos, both sides argue that they’re saving animals. Whether or not zoos benefit the animal community, they certainly do make money. As long as there is demand for them, zoos will continue to exist.
Why do animal rights activists oppose the existence of zoos?
  • A Zoos offer too much food and space to animals.
  • B Zoos foster an empathetic attitude toward animals.
  • C Zoos should not interfere with the life of any species.
  • D Zoos should not make money at the expense of animals.

思路引導 VIP

如果你現在還沒看到選項,請先觀察文章的第三段。當我們談論『權利 (rights)』時,作者提到人類對於其他生命是否擁有『主宰、改變或限制其行動』的資格?請試著從文中找出關於『人類權限範圍』的描述。

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

⚔️ 哼,還行嘛。

把頭巾綁上去了,這招三刀流解題法,你這次沒走錯路。總算看懂了文章裡那些對立的觀點了。不錯。

  1. 觀念驗證
▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀理解與多元智能理論:文本分析及批判性思考
查看更多「[法警] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)」的主題分類考古題