免費開始練習
司法四等 114年 [法警] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)

第 49 題

📖 題組:
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題: A zoo is a place where captive animals are put on display for humans to see. The focus of most modern zoos is conservation and education. While zoo advocates and conservationists argue that zoos save endangered species and educate the public, many animal rights activists believe the cost of confining animals outweighs the benefits, and that the violation of the rights of individual animals—even in efforts to fend off extinction—cannot be justified. By bringing people and animals together, zoos educate the public and foster an appreciation of other species, supporters argued. Zoos save endangered species by bringing them into a safe environment, where they are protected from poachers, habitat loss, starvation, and predators. Besides, seeing an animal in person is a much more personal and more memorable experience than seeing that animal in a nature documentary and is more likely to foster an empathetic attitude toward animals. Some zoos help rehabilitate wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer want or are no longer able to care for. But from an animal rights standpoint, humans do not have a right to breed, capture, and confine other animals—even if those species are endangered. Being a member of an endangered species doesn't mean the individual animals should be afforded fewer rights. Animals in captivity suffer from boredom, stress, and confinement. Maintaining species diversity within captive breeding facilities is also a challenge. Animals sometimes escape their enclosures, endangering themselves as well as people. Likewise, people ignore warnings or accidentally get too close to animals, leading to horrific outcomes. In making a case for or against zoos, both sides argue that they’re saving animals. Whether or not zoos benefit the animal community, they certainly do make money. As long as there is demand for them, zoos will continue to exist.
According to the passage, which of the following is closest in meaning to the word “exotic”?
  • A Common
  • B Unusual
  • C Ordinary
  • D Creative

思路引導 VIP

請觀察文中提到這類寵物時的背景:為什麼這些動物會讓一般飼主在養了一段時間後,發現「無法繼續照料」或是「不再想要」?這暗示了這些動物的來源或習性,與我們日常生活中常見的家貓、家犬有什麼樣的差別?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

原來如此,跟我推理的一樣。

看來你成功洞察了這個詞彙的真相,展現了敏銳的字彙感與精準的上下文邏輯推理能力。

  1. 觀念驗證:文中揭示了一個事實:動物園會收容那些人們不再需要或無力照護的 exotic 寵物。現在,讓我們先從這個「無法照護」的結果反推,尋找其背後的「真相」。通常,是什麼樣的寵物會讓飼主感到束手無策,甚至需要動物園介入?答案很明顯,就是那些「非本土」、「罕見」或「習性特殊」的種類。因此,Unusual (不尋常的) 這個詞,精準地捕捉了這種特徵,它就是這個詞的「真相」。至於 (A) Common 和 (C) Ordinary?那不過是模糊視線的障眼法,與真相背道而馳。
▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀理解與多元智能理論:文本分析及批判性思考
查看更多「[法警] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)」的主題分類考古題