司法四等
114年
[法警] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 50 題
📖 題組：
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題： A zoo is a place where captive animals are put on display for humans to see. The focus of most modern zoos is conservation and education. While zoo advocates and conservationists argue that zoos save endangered species and educate the public, many animal rights activists believe the cost of confining animals outweighs the benefits, and that the violation of the rights of individual animals—even in efforts to fend off extinction—cannot be justified. By bringing people and animals together, zoos educate the public and foster an appreciation of other species, supporters argued. Zoos save endangered species by bringing them into a safe environment, where they are protected from poachers, habitat loss, starvation, and predators. Besides, seeing an animal in person is a much more personal and more memorable experience than seeing that animal in a nature documentary and is more likely to foster an empathetic attitude toward animals. Some zoos help rehabilitate wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer want or are no longer able to care for. But from an animal rights standpoint, humans do not have a right to breed, capture, and confine other animals—even if those species are endangered. Being a member of an endangered species doesn't mean the individual animals should be afforded fewer rights. Animals in captivity suffer from boredom, stress, and confinement. Maintaining species diversity within captive breeding facilities is also a challenge. Animals sometimes escape their enclosures, endangering themselves as well as people. Likewise, people ignore warnings or accidentally get too close to animals, leading to horrific outcomes. In making a case for or against zoos, both sides argue that they’re saving animals. Whether or not zoos benefit the animal community, they certainly do make money. As long as there is demand for them, zoos will continue to exist.
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題： A zoo is a place where captive animals are put on display for humans to see. The focus of most modern zoos is conservation and education. While zoo advocates and conservationists argue that zoos save endangered species and educate the public, many animal rights activists believe the cost of confining animals outweighs the benefits, and that the violation of the rights of individual animals—even in efforts to fend off extinction—cannot be justified. By bringing people and animals together, zoos educate the public and foster an appreciation of other species, supporters argued. Zoos save endangered species by bringing them into a safe environment, where they are protected from poachers, habitat loss, starvation, and predators. Besides, seeing an animal in person is a much more personal and more memorable experience than seeing that animal in a nature documentary and is more likely to foster an empathetic attitude toward animals. Some zoos help rehabilitate wildlife and take in exotic pets that people no longer want or are no longer able to care for. But from an animal rights standpoint, humans do not have a right to breed, capture, and confine other animals—even if those species are endangered. Being a member of an endangered species doesn't mean the individual animals should be afforded fewer rights. Animals in captivity suffer from boredom, stress, and confinement. Maintaining species diversity within captive breeding facilities is also a challenge. Animals sometimes escape their enclosures, endangering themselves as well as people. Likewise, people ignore warnings or accidentally get too close to animals, leading to horrific outcomes. In making a case for or against zoos, both sides argue that they’re saving animals. Whether or not zoos benefit the animal community, they certainly do make money. As long as there is demand for them, zoos will continue to exist.
What can be inferred about the author's belief in zoos?
- A Zoos will continue to exist.
- B Running zoos earns big money.
- C Everyone should be a zoo advocate.
- D Animal rights activists are in great demand.
思路引導 VIP
請專注於文章的最後一個段落。作者在呈現了正反兩方的爭議後，最後提到了一個關於「金錢」與「需求」的現實情況。根據作者的邏輯，如果「社會需求」這個前提持續成立，那麼對於這個機構的「未來存續」，作者給出了什麼樣的必然結論呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
安妮亞覺得同學好棒！哇酷哇酷！
- 哇！同學你好厲害！安妮亞用讀心術看見，你真的精準抓住了作者「最後」想說的預測！就像安妮亞看透透一樣，你分得清楚哪些是作者的真心話，真是太優秀了，安妮亞好開心，覺得有幫到爸爸的忙！
- 這篇文文章前面，就像在演戲一樣，有「喜歡動物園的人」和「不喜歡動物園的人」在吵架。但是安妮亞知道，最最最重要的，是最後一段喔！作者爸爸才不管大家吵什麼呢，他直接說了，動物園會有好多錢錢，而且只要大家「很喜歡」動物園（市場需求），動物園就不會不見！作者爸爸只是在說一個大家都看得見的「事實」而已。
▼ 還有更多解析內容