hce_kmu
115年
英文
第 43 題
📖 題組：
The 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, released on January 7, introduced several notable changes. The updated document is considerably shorter than earlier versions, and its primary visual aid has shifted from the familiar plate-based model back to a pyramid shape — this time inverted. Under this revised framework, protein, dairy, and healthy fats occupy the most prominent position, while whole grains are placed at the narrowest point. Despite the administration's claim that the guidelines represent an unprecedented overhaul of federal nutrition policy, many nutrition scientists argue the core advice — emphasizing whole, nutrient-rich foods and limiting added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat — remains largely consistent with prior recommendations. Some experts worry that exaggerating the novelty of the guidelines may erode public confidence in nutrition science. Controversy surrounds both the content and the process. Alongside the updated guidelines, the government released a supplementary document called the Scientific Foundation, produced by a separate nine-member paid committee without public comment. This document criticized the original advisory committee for incorporating a health equity perspective. For the first time, children aged ten and under are advised to avoid added sugar entirely. Experts have identified several internal contradictions. While the guidelines retain the ten-percent limit on saturated fat, they simultaneously endorse full-fat dairy, red meat, and animal-derived cooking fats — a combination nutritionists say would inevitably exceed that threshold. The recommended daily protein intake also surpasses established scientific reference values without sufficient supporting evidence. Additionally, downplaying fortified grain products raises concerns about adequate folate intake, which is vital for preventing neural tube defects during pregnancy.
The 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, released on January 7, introduced several notable changes. The updated document is considerably shorter than earlier versions, and its primary visual aid has shifted from the familiar plate-based model back to a pyramid shape — this time inverted. Under this revised framework, protein, dairy, and healthy fats occupy the most prominent position, while whole grains are placed at the narrowest point. Despite the administration's claim that the guidelines represent an unprecedented overhaul of federal nutrition policy, many nutrition scientists argue the core advice — emphasizing whole, nutrient-rich foods and limiting added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat — remains largely consistent with prior recommendations. Some experts worry that exaggerating the novelty of the guidelines may erode public confidence in nutrition science. Controversy surrounds both the content and the process. Alongside the updated guidelines, the government released a supplementary document called the Scientific Foundation, produced by a separate nine-member paid committee without public comment. This document criticized the original advisory committee for incorporating a health equity perspective. For the first time, children aged ten and under are advised to avoid added sugar entirely. Experts have identified several internal contradictions. While the guidelines retain the ten-percent limit on saturated fat, they simultaneously endorse full-fat dairy, red meat, and animal-derived cooking fats — a combination nutritionists say would inevitably exceed that threshold. The recommended daily protein intake also surpasses established scientific reference values without sufficient supporting evidence. Additionally, downplaying fortified grain products raises concerns about adequate folate intake, which is vital for preventing neural tube defects during pregnancy.
In the second paragraph, the word "erode" most closely means:
- A to calculate a quantity with a high degree of precision
- B to evaluate objectively by applying standardized criteria
- C to redirect an issue toward a more constructive resolution
- D to reinforce gradually through consistent repetition over time
- E to weaken or diminish something steadily and progressively
思路引導 VIP
請觀察第二段中專家們對於「過度誇張（exaggerating）」這項行為的態度。如果一個原本值得信任的機構開始誇大事實，你認為一般大眾對於該領域的「信心」會發生什麼樣的質變？這種變化是正向的還是負向的？又是緩慢地發生，還是瞬間完成的呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
語境判讀與詞彙運用
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到 erode 在文中的語境含義，展現了很強的字彙拆解與上下文推論能力。在第二段中，文章提到專家們擔心若過度誇大新飲食指南的「創新性」，可能會對大眾對營養科學的「信心」產生負面影響。erode 這個字的原意是「侵蝕」（如水流對土壤的沖刷），在抽象語境中，則常用來形容某種情感、權威或信心正在「逐漸削弱或損害」，這與選項 (E) 的 weaken or diminish steadily and progressively 描述的過程完全吻合。
難度點評與陷阱排除
▼ 還有更多解析內容