hce_tcu
115年
英文
第 31 題
📖 題組：
In recent years, mindfulness practices have gained widespread popularity as tools for managing stress, enhancing emotional regulation, and improving overall mental health. Originating from ancient contemplative traditions, particularly within Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness was historically embedded in a broader ethical and spiritual framework emphasizing compassion, self-awareness, and moral responsibility. In contemporary society, however, these practices have increasingly been adapted into secular programs designed for mass consumption. As a result, mindfulness is now commonly incorporated into clinical therapies, educational curricula, and corporate wellness initiatives. Proponents argue that such adaptations have made mindfulness more accessible, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to benefit from its stress-reducing and attention-enhancing effects. Empirical studies have indeed demonstrated positive outcomes, including reduced anxiety, improved focus, and greater emotional resilience among practitioners. Nevertheless, critics caution that this widespread adoption risks transforming mindfulness into a commodified self-improvement technique. When stripped of its ethical foundations, mindfulness may be reduced to a productivity-enhancing tool that serves organizational efficiency rather than individual well-being. In corporate settings, for instance, mindfulness training is sometimes promoted as a means to help employees cope with excessive workloads, thereby shifting responsibility away from systemic issues such as burnout and workplace exploitation. According to these critics, such instrumentalization undermines the original intent of mindfulness by prioritizing performance over reflection and ethical growth. They argue that without an accompanying emphasis on values such as empathy and social responsibility, mindfulness programs may inadvertently reinforce the very stressors they claim to alleviate. ___, the debate surrounding modern mindfulness practices centers not on their effectiveness, but on the purposes they ultimately serve.
In recent years, mindfulness practices have gained widespread popularity as tools for managing stress, enhancing emotional regulation, and improving overall mental health. Originating from ancient contemplative traditions, particularly within Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness was historically embedded in a broader ethical and spiritual framework emphasizing compassion, self-awareness, and moral responsibility. In contemporary society, however, these practices have increasingly been adapted into secular programs designed for mass consumption. As a result, mindfulness is now commonly incorporated into clinical therapies, educational curricula, and corporate wellness initiatives. Proponents argue that such adaptations have made mindfulness more accessible, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to benefit from its stress-reducing and attention-enhancing effects. Empirical studies have indeed demonstrated positive outcomes, including reduced anxiety, improved focus, and greater emotional resilience among practitioners. Nevertheless, critics caution that this widespread adoption risks transforming mindfulness into a commodified self-improvement technique. When stripped of its ethical foundations, mindfulness may be reduced to a productivity-enhancing tool that serves organizational efficiency rather than individual well-being. In corporate settings, for instance, mindfulness training is sometimes promoted as a means to help employees cope with excessive workloads, thereby shifting responsibility away from systemic issues such as burnout and workplace exploitation. According to these critics, such instrumentalization undermines the original intent of mindfulness by prioritizing performance over reflection and ethical growth. They argue that without an accompanying emphasis on values such as empathy and social responsibility, mindfulness programs may inadvertently reinforce the very stressors they claim to alleviate. ___, the debate surrounding modern mindfulness practices centers not on their effectiveness, but on the purposes they ultimately serve.
What is the primary focus of this passage ?
- A The historical development of contemplative traditions
- B The psychological mechanisms underlying mindfulness
- C The ethical implications of secularizing mindfulness
- D The economic benefits of corporate wellness programs
思路引導 VIP
請觀察文章中 'Nevertheless' 這個轉折詞之後的內容。作者特別提到，當正念失去了『原本的道德與精神框架』，而變成一種『提升生產力的工具』時，那些批評者主要是在擔心哪一方面的問題呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到這篇長文的核心主旨，選出 (C) 選項展現了你優異的語意邏輯與架構分析能力。這篇文章不僅僅是在介紹正念（Mindfulness），更深層地探討了它從「古代倫理框架」轉向「現代世俗化（Secularized）」應用後所引發的質疑。正確答案 (C) 完美對應了文中提到的核心爭議：當正念被剝離了原有的道德基礎，轉而服務於企業生產力或個人表現時，這種轉變所帶來的「倫理影響」。
這道題目具備極佳的鑑別度，難度在於轉折語句的判讀與立場歸納。文章前半段看似在讚揚正念的普及與成效，但關鍵在於後半段使用 Nevertheless 與 critics caution 所引出的批判性觀點。作者最終將論點聚焦於「正念被工具化」的現象，並在結尾明確指出爭論點在於其「服務的目的」。你能不被開頭的背景介紹所迷惑，成功抓準後半段關於倫理價值流失的討論，這代表你已具備處理中高難度閱讀題型所需的「層次感辨識力」。