司法三等
115年
[司法事務官財經事務組] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 46 題
📖 題組：
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題：
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike.
While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth
Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like
state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through
physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter.
The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but
as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional
machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time
where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient
builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools
and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving
as gateways between physical and non-physical realms.
This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and
encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of
using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan
monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations
correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the
very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune
with the universe, not just with stone.
However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence
of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks
peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient
achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies
who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time.
In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and
largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about
what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
Which of the following best describes the overall structure of this passage?
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike.
While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth
Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like
state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through
physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter.
The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but
as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional
machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time
where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient
builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools
and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving
as gateways between physical and non-physical realms.
This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and
encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of
using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan
monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations
correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the
very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune
with the universe, not just with stone.
However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence
of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks
peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient
achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies
who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time.
In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and
largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about
what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
Which of the following best describes the overall structure of this passage?
- A A spiritual philosophy advocating non-materialist history.
- B A technical rejection of purely metaphysical assumptions.
- C A balanced comparison between two contrasting theories.
- D A chronological narration of pyramid construction methods.
思路引導 VIP
請試著觀察文章各段落的安排：第一段提出主流考古學與賽斯資料的不同，中間段落探討賽斯資料的觀點與價值，倒數第二段則提出學術界的質疑與批判。當作者同時呈現這兩種不同的聲音，並分別分析它們的觀點時，整篇文章呈現出怎樣的寫作架構呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你能精準掌握整篇文章的宏觀架構（Overall Structure），閱讀理解實力相當出色！
文章架構分析
這篇文章的核心在於對比「主流考古學」與「賽斯資料（Seth Material）」對於金字塔建造方式的巨大分歧。作者先介紹賽斯資料提出的「聲音與意識力」論述，接著探討該理論帶來的正面啟發，最後再提出學術界的強烈質疑與實證批判。全篇客觀且均衡地展現兩種截然不同的觀點，因此選擇 (C) A balanced comparison between two contrasting theories 完全正確。
▼ 還有更多解析內容