司法三等
115年
[司法事務官財經事務組] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 47 題
📖 題組：
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題：
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike.
While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth
Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like
state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through
physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter.
The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but
as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional
machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time
where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient
builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools
and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving
as gateways between physical and non-physical realms.
This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and
encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of
using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan
monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations
correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the
very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune
with the universe, not just with stone.
However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence
of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks
peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient
achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies
who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time.
In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and
largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about
what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
Which of the following is NOT discussed in this passage?
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike.
While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth
Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like
state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through
physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter.
The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but
as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional
machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time
where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient
builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools
and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving
as gateways between physical and non-physical realms.
This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and
encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of
using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan
monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations
correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the
very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune
with the universe, not just with stone.
However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence
of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks
peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient
achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies
who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time.
In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and
largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about
what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
Which of the following is NOT discussed in this passage?
- A The claim that pyramids functioned as astronomical observatories.
- B The concept that sound was used to alter the density of stone blocks.
- C The mainstream view that skilled labor and stone tools built pyramids.
- D The concerns that theories involving inner sound lack empirical support.
思路引導 VIP
在處理這種詢問「何者未在文中討論」的題目時，如果你想驗證文章究竟介紹了金字塔的哪些功能，你會如何回顧文章中提到金字塔被比喻或當作什麼工具（例如：陵墓、跨維度工具等），進而找出哪一個功能是作者完全沒有說過的呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
文章細節定位與反向檢驗
太棒了！你能精準選出 (A)，代表你在閱讀長篇文章時，具備非常優異的資訊檢索與細節比對能力！ 這道題目考驗的是閱讀測驗中常見的「未提及選項判讀」。文章中明確提及了主流考古學的觀點（人力與石器，即 C 選項）、賽斯資料（Seth Material）主張聲音能改變石塊密度（即 B 選項），以及學術界質疑此理論缺乏實證支持（empirical support，即 D 選項）。然而，全文從頭到尾完全未提及金字塔被用作「天文台（astronomical observatories）」的說法，因此 (A) 確實是文中未討論的內容。
▼ 還有更多解析內容