司法三等
115年
[司法事務官財經事務組] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 48 題
📖 題組：
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
請依下文回答第 46 題至第 50 題：
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike.
While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth
Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like
state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through
physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter.
The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but
as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional
machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time
where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient
builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools
and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving
as gateways between physical and non-physical realms.
This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and
encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of
using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan
monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations
correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the
very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune
with the universe, not just with stone.
However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence
of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks
peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient
achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies
who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time.
In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and
largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about
what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
According to the passage, what purpose does the comparison to Tibetan monks serve?
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike.
While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth
Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like
state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through
physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter.
The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but
as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional
machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time
where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient
builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools
and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving
as gateways between physical and non-physical realms.
This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and
encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of
using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan
monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations
correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the
very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune
with the universe, not just with stone.
However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence
of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks
peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient
achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies
who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time.
In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and
largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about
what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
According to the passage, what purpose does the comparison to Tibetan monks serve?
- A Proving that sound has seldom been used to levitate objects.
- B Refuting the Seth Material by pointing out alternative explanations.
- C Providing an example of similar metaphysical claims across cultures.
- D Explaining why Eastern traditions had better technology than Egyptians.
思路引導 VIP
請觀察文章提到「西藏僧侶」那一句話的前後文：作者在引入這個例子之前，用了什麼字詞（例如 echoes）來描述這種觀念與其他古代傳統的關係？作者舉這個例子的主要目的，是為了證實某個事實，還是為了說明這種想法在其他文化中也能找到類似的影子呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了，準確抓到了文中的關鍵線索！
跨文化概念的呼應與比喻
文章第三段提到「運用聲音與心念專注來塑造現實」的概念，正好**呼應（echoes）**了其他古代智慧傳統，隨後便舉出「西藏僧侶透過吟唱移動物體」作為例子。作者引用西藏僧侶的例子，並非要證明其真實性，而是為了說明這種形而上學（metaphysical）的觀點並非獨特孤立，而是存在於不同文化間的相似主張，因此選 (C) 非常精準。
▼ 還有更多解析內容