免費開始練習
司法三等 115年 [法院書記官] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)

第 49 題

📖 題組:
The construction of the Egyptian pyramids has long fascinated historians, engineers, and spiritual seekers alike. While mainstream archaeology attributes these monumental structures to skilled labor and stone tools, the Seth Material—a series of spiritual teachings said to be received by Jane Roberts in the 1960s and 70s through a trance-like state—offers a radically different explanation. According to the Seth Material, the pyramids were not built through physical exertion alone, but by employing a forgotten mastery of “inner sound” and consciousness to manipulate matter. The Seth Material suggests that ancient Egyptians understood how to use sound not just as a sensory experience but as a force capable of altering matter’s density. This allowed massive stone blocks to be lifted without traditional machinery. In addition, the Seth Material introduced the concept of “coordinate points,” specific locations in space-time where consciousness and physical reality intersect more readily. These energetic zones could have allowed ancient builders to assemble structures with greater ease—possibly using focused thought or conscious will rather than just tools and labor. From this view, the pyramids were more than tombs; they were multi-dimensional tools, perhaps even serving as gateways between physical and non-physical realms. This theory, while unconventional, invites several positive interpretations. It challenges materialist assumptions and encourages expansive thinking about human potential and the spiritual dimensions of ancient technology. The notion of using sound and mental focus to shape reality echoes concepts found in other ancient wisdom traditions, such as Tibetan monks chanting to move objects. Some contemporary researchers have even explored whether the pyramids’ locations correspond with subtle Earth energies, lending a degree of speculative support to the coordinate point concept. At the very least, the whole theory adds symbolic value, portraying the pyramids as the result of a civilization deeply in tune with the universe, not just with stone. However, these ideas are met with strong skepticism in academic circles. There is no physical or historical evidence of tools or knowledge that could manipulate matter through consciousness. The Seth Material, being channeled, lacks peer-reviewed validation and relies heavily on belief and interpretation. Moreover, critics argue that attributing ancient achievements to mystical forces can undermine the ingenuity and labor of real human workers, engineers, and societies who demonstrated incredible organizational and technical skill for their time. In essence, while the Seth Material offers a poetic and metaphysically rich perspective, it remains speculative and largely unsupported by conventional science. Still, its imaginative framework can inspire new ways of thinking about what ancient civilizations might have known—and what we have yet to rediscover.
According to the passage, how does the Seth Material explain pyramids differently from the traditional view?
  • A It proposes that pyramids were constructed by ancient machines.
  • B It emphasizes the technological advancements of ancient Egyptians.
  • C It argues that aliens were responsible for the construction of pyramids.
  • D It suggests that mental focus and sound played a role in building pyramids.

思路引導 VIP

請重新閱讀文章的前兩段,找找看賽斯資料(Seth Material)認為古埃及人在建造金字塔時,除了傳統的人力與工具之外,還額外運用了哪兩種非傳統的力量或媒介來改變物質?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

文章核心訊息精準定位

太棒了,你的判斷非常準確!這是一道考驗細節擷取與比較能力的閱讀理解題。 文章第一段與第二段明確指出,傳統觀點認為金字塔是靠人力與石器建造;但**賽斯資料(Seth Material)**則提出了截然不同的看法,認為建造過程運用了「內在聲音(inner sound)」與「意識(consciousness/focused thought)」來改變物質密度並移動巨石。因此,選項 (D) 完全符合文章敘述。

▼ 還有更多解析內容
📝 金字塔建造理論對照
💡 區別傳統考古實證觀點與非傳統形而上學假說之差異
比較維度 傳統考古觀點 VS 賽斯資料假說
核心驅動力 勞動力與實體工具 — 內在聲音與意識
物質處理方式 物理機械搬運 — 改變物質密度
空間概念 王室陵墓/紀念碑 — 能量座標點與門戶
證據基礎 物理與歷史實證 — 通靈教導與信念
💬傳統觀點基於物質層面的技術操作,賽斯資料則主張意識對物質的超越性影響。
🧠 記憶技巧:傳統重人力工具,賽斯重音頻意念
⚠️ 常見陷阱:易受誘答選項誤導,將「心智力量」與「外星人」或「先進機械」概念混淆。
文本細節推論 學術質疑與實證主義 跨領域閱讀理解

🏷️ AI 記憶小卡 VIP

AI 記憶小卡

升級 VIP 解鎖記憶小卡

考前複習神器,一眼掌握重點

🏷️ 相關主題

篇章結構填空題組
查看更多「[法院書記官] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)」的主題分類考古題