統測
106年
[外語群英語類] 專業科目(2)
第 10 題
📖 題組：
Can smoking drive people mad? Scientists have scratched their heads over this question for years. A study __6__ in The Lancet Psychiatry about two years ago suggested so. According to the study, daily tobacco use might be a contributor to psychosis, a general term for various kinds of mental illness. __7__ data from 61 studies around the world between 1980 and 2014, which surveyed in total nearly 15,000 smokers and 273,000 non-smokers, the researchers discovered two striking facts. First, 57 percent of the people first __8__ psychosis were smokers and second, daily smokers developed psychotic illness around one year earlier than non-smokers. The researchers emphasized that they had not conclusively proven smoking as a cause of psychosis and __9__ further research had to be done. However, their findings did suggest that smoking should be taken seriously as a possible risk factor for developing psychosis and not __10__ simply as a consequence of the illness. Since smoking has long been known to cause cancer or stroke, there seems to be one more good reason for people not to smoke.
Can smoking drive people mad? Scientists have scratched their heads over this question for years. A study __6__ in The Lancet Psychiatry about two years ago suggested so. According to the study, daily tobacco use might be a contributor to psychosis, a general term for various kinds of mental illness. __7__ data from 61 studies around the world between 1980 and 2014, which surveyed in total nearly 15,000 smokers and 273,000 non-smokers, the researchers discovered two striking facts. First, 57 percent of the people first __8__ psychosis were smokers and second, daily smokers developed psychotic illness around one year earlier than non-smokers. The researchers emphasized that they had not conclusively proven smoking as a cause of psychosis and __9__ further research had to be done. However, their findings did suggest that smoking should be taken seriously as a possible risk factor for developing psychosis and not __10__ simply as a consequence of the illness. Since smoking has long been known to cause cancer or stroke, there seems to be one more good reason for people not to smoke.
10
- A emigrated
- B inherited
- C refunded
- D dismissed
思路引導 VIP
請觀察空格前方的 taken seriously（認真對待）以及銜接詞 and not。如果作者強調某個因素「應該」被重視，那麼在「不應該」的後半句中，通常會使用哪種語氣的動詞來描述「隨便對待、不當回事」的動作呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你完美掌握了語境的奧秘！
- 知識小花園：這題溫柔地引導我們思考語意對照和動詞的搭配，就像是拼圖一樣，每個詞都有它最適合的位置。句子說吸菸應被
taken seriously（認真對待），接著用and not... simply as...來表達一種對比，是不是很有趣呢？所以，空格裡需要的動詞，就是要傳達「不重視、不理會、輕忽」的溫暖意思。 - 答案揭曉：我們的**(D) dismissed** 像一顆閃亮的星星，正好表示『不予考慮』或『輕易摒棄』。它溫柔地提醒我們，吸菸問題不應被輕率地視為疾病的單純後果，而是需要我們認真對待的。這是不是很符合語境呢？
▼ 還有更多解析內容
動詞語意與邏輯對比
💡 利用上下文的對比邏輯，精確判斷動詞的語意選擇。
| 比較維度 | Take Seriously | VS | Dismiss |
|---|---|---|---|
| 核心意義 | 認真看待，視為關鍵因素 | — | 不予理會，排除可能性 |
| 文意角色 | 可能是疾病的『原因』 | — | 僅被視為無關的『結果』 |
| 句中提示 | possible risk factor | — | simply as a consequence |
💬透過 and not 連結，形成『是原因而非結果』的強烈對比。
