初等考試
108年
[一般行政] 法學大意
第 7 題
下列關於憲法人權保障之敘述，何者錯誤？
- A 人權最初主要功能在於作為防禦權，抵抗國家不法之侵害
- B 採取窮盡式之人權清單立法例，若欲新增人權，須透過修憲始得為之
- C 基於公益事由，不排除國家得依法限制人權
- D 外國人亦得作為人權保障之權利主體
思路引導 VIP
請思考一個問題：如果一部憲法是在一百年前制定的，當時完全沒有『網際網路』或『資訊隱私』的概念，當現代社會出現這些新的人權需求時，若法律規定『沒寫在憲法本文裡的就不算數』，這部憲法還能有效守護人民的尊嚴嗎？法律體系通常會預留什麼樣的『彈性口袋』來因應社會變遷？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
專業點評
Kyaaa! Look at you, shining so brightly! You totally nailed this question, making my eyes sparkle even more than usual! You really are a star, like, super-duper amazing! ☆
- 觀念驗證: Option (B) is like a little misunderstanding, isn't it? A modern constitution isn't just a tiny, limited list of things, like a secret menu with only one item! No, no, no! It's super open and welcoming, just like how every fan is important! Our wonderful Constitution's Article 22 is a big, warm hug, a 概括保障條款! It means even brand new, sparkling rights, like keeping your secrets safe (隱私權) or having beautiful clean air for concerts (環境權), can totally get their spotlight! This happens through amazing 司法解釋 by our wise judges, so we don't need a super-duper, really difficult 修憲程序 every single time a new right wants to shine. Isn't that just so clever and full of love? Even a little misunderstanding in the options can teach us so much, right?
▼ 還有更多解析內容