調查局三等
109年
[調查工作組] 外國文(英文)
第 33 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第31題至第35題 The Canadian government is hoping to use artificial intelligence (AI) to inform how it mounts legal challenges to immigration and refugee claims as part of a new pilot program. Ottawa plans on using the emerging technology to reduce government lawyers’ need to perform their own legal research, a costly and time-consuming process. But there are already concerns that the nuanced and difficult nature of many refugee and immigration claims may be lost on those government computer systems, leading to massive human-rights implications. And the government admits that it hopes to use AI and machine learning, eventually, to help determine refugee applications themselves. The plan is all laid out in a request for information submitted to industry. The request for information asks industry to submit their own technological solutions for a joint pilot project, run by Citizenship and Immigration Canada and Justice Canada, to “support case law and legal research, facilitate trend analysis in litigation, predict litigation outcomes, and help develop legal advice and assessments,” according to a government spokesperson. The government hopes that, if the pilot is a success, front-line immigration officials in Canada and abroad could use this technology “to aid in their assessment of the merits of an application before decisions are finalized.” Lex Gill, a research fellow who specializes in AI and public policy, said replacing human work with algorithms, especially if the data that goes into them is itself flawed, will always pose potential human-rights concerns. “There is the risk that instead of improving the situation, these technologies may just entrench or encourage unfair or discriminatory practices,” she said. But while the debate around those risks continues, Ottawa is already getting set to roll out the pilot project.
請回答下列第31題至第35題 The Canadian government is hoping to use artificial intelligence (AI) to inform how it mounts legal challenges to immigration and refugee claims as part of a new pilot program. Ottawa plans on using the emerging technology to reduce government lawyers’ need to perform their own legal research, a costly and time-consuming process. But there are already concerns that the nuanced and difficult nature of many refugee and immigration claims may be lost on those government computer systems, leading to massive human-rights implications. And the government admits that it hopes to use AI and machine learning, eventually, to help determine refugee applications themselves. The plan is all laid out in a request for information submitted to industry. The request for information asks industry to submit their own technological solutions for a joint pilot project, run by Citizenship and Immigration Canada and Justice Canada, to “support case law and legal research, facilitate trend analysis in litigation, predict litigation outcomes, and help develop legal advice and assessments,” according to a government spokesperson. The government hopes that, if the pilot is a success, front-line immigration officials in Canada and abroad could use this technology “to aid in their assessment of the merits of an application before decisions are finalized.” Lex Gill, a research fellow who specializes in AI and public policy, said replacing human work with algorithms, especially if the data that goes into them is itself flawed, will always pose potential human-rights concerns. “There is the risk that instead of improving the situation, these technologies may just entrench or encourage unfair or discriminatory practices,” she said. But while the debate around those risks continues, Ottawa is already getting set to roll out the pilot project.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is true?
- A Using AI technology in immigration in Canada may raise human rights issues.
- B Ottawa has adopted the emerging technology to predict litigation outcomes.
- C The Canadian government has successfully used AI to determine refugee applications.
- D The data on the Canadian government computer systems is itself flawed.
思路引導 VIP
當政府計畫將「冷冰冰的自動化演算法」應用在涉及「個人尊嚴與生命安全」的移民決策時，請在文中尋找：專家除了擔心效率之外，最擔憂這種決策方式會對受影響者的「基本權益」產生什麼樣的潛在負面衝擊？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
🌟 太棒了！你真的很用心、很厲害耶！
你能從這麼多資訊中，精準地抓出關鍵爭議點，這代表你擁有超棒的閱讀理解力和判斷細節的能力喔！真的非常替你開心！
- 觀念確認：你選擇的 (A) 是完全正確的！文章在第一段的結尾提到了 massive human-rights implications，還有第三段研究員指出的 unfair or discriminatory practices，這都清楚地說明了 AI 在處理人道案件時，其公平性確實受到很強烈的質疑呢。你真的有讀懂文章的核心！
▼ 還有更多解析內容