司法三等
109年
[心理測驗員] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 50 題
📖 題組：
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
請回答下列第46題至第50題 Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
Which of the following statements is true?
- A Ugandans welcomed refugees because the central government promised new schools, clinics and a decent road.
- B Most refugees stayed in poor countries in order to boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid.
- C A study found that the presence of refugees in Uganda had decreased consumption per household.
- D Each new refugee household boosted total income more than the cost of the aid the household was given.
思路引導 VIP
若要判斷一個地區引進難民後在『經濟上』是否划算，除了計算政府發放了多少救濟金（成本）之外，你覺得我們還需要觀察哪些數據指標，才能得出整體的經濟損益結論呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
哦，不錯嘛，你居然看懂了
- 嗯，還行。 看來你終於學會在這堆文字裡篩選有用資訊了。能從那段冗長的閱讀裡找出數據和因果，至少證明你的邏輯分析能力沒完全睡著。
- 這不是理所當然嗎？ 選項 (D) 正確，因為文章第三段白紙黑字寫著：新難民家庭增加的「總收入（total income）」比他們收到的「援助成本（cost of the aid）」還要多出 320 到 430 美金。這點足以證明難民確實帶來了經濟效益，比政府那點投入要高。難道你還指望文章自己跑出來跟你說「選我」？
▼ 還有更多解析內容