司法三等
109年
[觀護人] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 50 題
📖 題組：
Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
Two years ago, a group of elders in a village in north-western Uganda agreed to lend their land to refugees from South Sudan. About 120,000 are now in the surrounding area. Here they live in tarpaulin shelters and mud-brick huts on a patch of scrub where cows once grazed. Kemis Butele, a gravel-voiced Ugandan elder, explains that hosting refugees is a way for a remote place, long neglected by the central government, to get noticed. He hopes for new schools, clinics and a decent road – and “that our children can get jobs.” There are more than 20 million refugees in the world today, more than at any time since the end of the second world war. Nearly 90% reside in poor countries. In many, to preserve jobs for natives, governments bar refugees from working in the formal economy. Uganda has shown how a different approach can reap dividends. The government gives refugees land plots and lets them work. In some places, the refugees boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid. Mr. Butele and many other Ugandans see their new neighbors as a benefit, not a burden. Sadly, such attitudes are still the exception. Refugees are “brothers and sisters,”say many Ugandans. Mr. Butele was once one himself. But the welcome is also a pragmatic one. Northern Uganda is so poor that some locals pose as refugees to receive food aid. Others see refugees as buyers for local goods. Elsewhere in Uganda has indeed seen such positive spillover. One study from 2016 found that the presence of Congolese refugees in western Uganda had increased consumption per household. Another estimates that each new refugee household boosts total income, including that of refugees, by $320-430 more than the cost of the aid the household is given. That rises to $560-670 when refugees are given cash instead of rations.
Which of the following statements is true?
- A Ugandans welcomed refugees because the central government promised new schools, clinics and a decent road.
- B Most refugees stayed in poor countries in order to boost local businesses and act as a magnet for foreign aid.
- C A study found that the presence of refugees in Uganda had decreased consumption per household.
- D Each new refugee household boosted total income more than the cost of the aid the household was given.
思路引導 VIP
請觀察文章最後一段出現具體金額（如 $320-430$）的句子。作者將「援助難民的開銷」與「難民為當地創造的收入」兩者進行比較後，得出了什麼樣的數學關係？這個發現如何支持了文中「難民是利益而非負擔」的觀點？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
哈哈哈哈！你的心，燃燒起來了！太棒了！
- 觀念驗證：嗯！你精準地鎖定了文章最後一段的關鍵數據！這是何等的判斷力啊！文中清清楚楚地寫著，每個新難民家庭所帶動的總收入（total income），比該家庭獲得的援助成本（cost of the aid）還要多出 $320 到 $430 美金啊！這是鐵一般的事實！沒錯！這完美地證實了選項 (D) 是絕對正確的！做得好！
- 難度點評：這題的難度是 Medium！但你勇敢地突破了它！題目中有一些狡猾的陷阱！比如 (A) 將「村民的期望」誤認為「政府的承諾」！(B) 則誤用了「為了...（目的）」的因果關係！但是！你完全避開了它們！這表示你的細節比對能力像火焰一樣熾熱！繼續努力吧！我非常非常高興！