統測
111年
[外語群英語類] 專業科目(2)
第 16-20 題
📖 題組：
Multiculturalism in U.S. schools and society is taking on new dimensions of complexity and practicality. In the 21st century, people from different ethnic, racial, and cultural groups live in close physical proximity. But coexistence does not necessarily mean that people create genuine communities. These unfamiliar cultures and languages can produce anxieties, hostilities, prejudices, and racist behaviors among those who do not understand the newcomers or who perceive them as threats to their safety and security. The lack of a genuine community of diversity is particularly evident in school curriculums that still do not regularly and systematically include important information about a wide range of diverse ethnic groups. As disparities in educational opportunities and outcomes among ethnic groups continue to grow, the resulting achievement gap has reached crisis proportions. Multicultural education is integral to improving the academic success of students of color and preparing all youths for democratic citizenship in a pluralistic society. People coming from Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Africa differ greatly from earlier generations of immigrants who came primarily from western and northern Europe. Students need to understand how multicultural issues shape the social, political, economic, and cultural fabric of the United States as well as how such issues fundamentally influence their personal lives. Even though some theorists argued that multicultural education is a necessary ingredient of quality education, in actual practice, educators most often perceive it either as an addition prompted by some crisis or as a luxury. Multicultural education has not become a central part of the curriculum regularly offered to all students; instead, educators have downgraded it primarily to social studies, language arts, and fine arts, and they have generally targeted instruction for students of color. Another obstacle to implementing multicultural education lies with teachers themselves. Many are unconvinced of its worth or its value in developing academic skills and building a unified national community. Even those teachers who are more accepting of multicultural education are nevertheless skeptical about the feasibility of its implementation. They tend to perceive multicultural education as separate content that educators must add to existing curriculums as separate lessons, units, or courses. Quite the contrary is true. Multicultural education is more than content; it must be a part of everything that happens in the education enterprise. Making explicit connections between multicultural education and subject- and skill-based curriculum is imperative.
Multiculturalism in U.S. schools and society is taking on new dimensions of complexity and practicality. In the 21st century, people from different ethnic, racial, and cultural groups live in close physical proximity. But coexistence does not necessarily mean that people create genuine communities. These unfamiliar cultures and languages can produce anxieties, hostilities, prejudices, and racist behaviors among those who do not understand the newcomers or who perceive them as threats to their safety and security. The lack of a genuine community of diversity is particularly evident in school curriculums that still do not regularly and systematically include important information about a wide range of diverse ethnic groups. As disparities in educational opportunities and outcomes among ethnic groups continue to grow, the resulting achievement gap has reached crisis proportions. Multicultural education is integral to improving the academic success of students of color and preparing all youths for democratic citizenship in a pluralistic society. People coming from Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Africa differ greatly from earlier generations of immigrants who came primarily from western and northern Europe. Students need to understand how multicultural issues shape the social, political, economic, and cultural fabric of the United States as well as how such issues fundamentally influence their personal lives. Even though some theorists argued that multicultural education is a necessary ingredient of quality education, in actual practice, educators most often perceive it either as an addition prompted by some crisis or as a luxury. Multicultural education has not become a central part of the curriculum regularly offered to all students; instead, educators have downgraded it primarily to social studies, language arts, and fine arts, and they have generally targeted instruction for students of color. Another obstacle to implementing multicultural education lies with teachers themselves. Many are unconvinced of its worth or its value in developing academic skills and building a unified national community. Even those teachers who are more accepting of multicultural education are nevertheless skeptical about the feasibility of its implementation. They tend to perceive multicultural education as separate content that educators must add to existing curriculums as separate lessons, units, or courses. Quite the contrary is true. Multicultural education is more than content; it must be a part of everything that happens in the education enterprise. Making explicit connections between multicultural education and subject- and skill-based curriculum is imperative.
從下列選項選出題組標示題號位置最適當的答案
思路引導 VIP
請深入分析文章後兩段中，教育者對多元文化教育在「定位」上的普遍認知與作者的主張有何關鍵差異？特別是當作者提到多元文化教育不應只是「額外的內容（separate content）」時，他強調的是一種什麼樣的「結構性整合（integral connection）」來賦予其在教學實踐中的核心地位？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
🌟 專業肯定
Okay，你這次沒搞砸，算你運氣好。這篇什麼「多元文化教育」的東西，扯到社會學跟教育學，一堆廢話，不過你倒是抓到重點了。看來你還不笨，至少應付這種複雜句構跟學術詞彙沒翻車，離滿級分只差一步，別太得意。
📖 觀念驗證
▼ 還有更多解析內容
多元文化教育實務
💡 多元文化教育應融入所有學科，而非視為額外補救或特定科目。
| 比較維度 | 現狀誤解 | VS | 理想實踐 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 定位 | 危機處理或奢侈品 | — | 教育不可或缺的成分 |
| 對象 | 針對少數族群學生 | — | 全體學生的公民教育 |
| 範疇 | 侷限社會、藝術學科 | — | 融入所有學科教學 |
💬多元文化教育應從「邊緣的外掛課程」轉變為「核心的教學基石」。
