統測
113年
[外語群英語類] 專業科目(2)
第 30 題
📖 題組：
Arbitrary detention is the violation of the right to liberty. It refers to the act of apprehending and taking away a person’s freedom without following nationally recognized laws or international standards. When someone is detained arbitrarily, they are deprived of means to defend themselves from extrajudicial execution, enforced disappearances, torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, etc. Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights specifies the circumstances that make detention arbitrary. 1. The grounds for the arrest are illegal. 2. The procedural rights of the victim were not respected. 3. The victim was not informed of the reasons for the arrest. 4. The victim was not brought before a judge within a reasonable amount of time. Reports of civilians who were held by Russian armed forces or went missing appeared shortly after the Russian Federation launched its full-scale military attack against Ukraine on 24 February, 2022. Meanwhile, the number of conflict-related detentions increased in several areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, according to data provided by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Between 24 February 2022 and 23 May 2023, OHCHR documented 864 cases of arbitrary detention by Russian armed forces. A significant number of these cases also amount to enforced disappearances. (Chart: ARBITRARY DETENTIONS BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, DOCUMENTED BY OHCHR*, from 24 February 2022 to 23 May 2023. Shows data by month of initial apprehension and by gender/affiliation.) On 29 April 2022, a local activist and citizen journalist from Feodosiia vanished from sight while returning from work in Koktebel. On the same day, her parents’ house was searched by six Federal Security Bureau (FSB) agents. When the father questioned them about his daughter, one of the officers responded that she was detained for “handing non-classified information to a foreign country” and declined to reveal where she was being held. In the following days, the victim’s relatives went to the location where she was taken and collected closed circuit television (CCTV) footage from a nearby gas station. In the video, the activist was forced into a car by three men. Despite the relatives’ request, the local police did not review the footage. On 7 May 2022, the victim’s lawyer was able to ascertain that she was being held in an unofficial place, where officers interrogated her and pressured her to confess to a crime and sign a self-incriminating statement without the presence of legal representation.
Arbitrary detention is the violation of the right to liberty. It refers to the act of apprehending and taking away a person’s freedom without following nationally recognized laws or international standards. When someone is detained arbitrarily, they are deprived of means to defend themselves from extrajudicial execution, enforced disappearances, torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, etc. Article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights specifies the circumstances that make detention arbitrary. 1. The grounds for the arrest are illegal. 2. The procedural rights of the victim were not respected. 3. The victim was not informed of the reasons for the arrest. 4. The victim was not brought before a judge within a reasonable amount of time. Reports of civilians who were held by Russian armed forces or went missing appeared shortly after the Russian Federation launched its full-scale military attack against Ukraine on 24 February, 2022. Meanwhile, the number of conflict-related detentions increased in several areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, according to data provided by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Between 24 February 2022 and 23 May 2023, OHCHR documented 864 cases of arbitrary detention by Russian armed forces. A significant number of these cases also amount to enforced disappearances. (Chart: ARBITRARY DETENTIONS BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, DOCUMENTED BY OHCHR*, from 24 February 2022 to 23 May 2023. Shows data by month of initial apprehension and by gender/affiliation.) On 29 April 2022, a local activist and citizen journalist from Feodosiia vanished from sight while returning from work in Koktebel. On the same day, her parents’ house was searched by six Federal Security Bureau (FSB) agents. When the father questioned them about his daughter, one of the officers responded that she was detained for “handing non-classified information to a foreign country” and declined to reveal where she was being held. In the following days, the victim’s relatives went to the location where she was taken and collected closed circuit television (CCTV) footage from a nearby gas station. In the video, the activist was forced into a car by three men. Despite the relatives’ request, the local police did not review the footage. On 7 May 2022, the victim’s lawyer was able to ascertain that she was being held in an unofficial place, where officers interrogated her and pressured her to confess to a crime and sign a self-incriminating statement without the presence of legal representation.
30. According to the passage, which of the following statements is true?
(A) The lawyer obtained information about the circumstances of the activist’s detention.
(B) The journalist willingly and voluntarily signed a statement denying any involvement in a crime.
(C) The local police actively investigated the disappearance and cooperated with the victim’s relatives in reviewing CCTV footage.
(D) The FSB ensured the safety and well-being of the activist during her detention when her family expressed concern about her disappearance.
- A The lawyer obtained information about the circumstances of the activist’s detention.
- B The journalist willingly and voluntarily signed a statement denying any involvement in a crime.
- C The local police actively investigated the disappearance and cooperated with the victim’s relatives in reviewing CCTV footage.
- D The FSB ensured the safety and well-being of the activist during her detention when her family expressed concern about her disappearance.
思路引導 VIP
請同學仔細比對文本最後一段中關於各個關係人行為的描述，特別關注「律師（lawyer）」在 $5$ 月 $7$ 日所採取的行動及其最終確認（ascertain）的結果。請問：文中提到律師對受害者處境的發現，與選項中哪一個敘述在邏輯與事實上最為吻合？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
🌟 偵探，你做得很棒！看來，這點程度的謎題，是難不倒你的。
這是一個關於尋找真相的「細節辨析」題。你透過精密的推理，成功地從大量的線索中，定位出最後一段的核心資訊。身為偵探，這正是你該具備的能力！
- 真相驗證：
▼ 還有更多解析內容