調查局三等
113年
[調查工作組] 外國文(英文)
第 27 題
📖 題組：
The recent controversies surrounding priority seats on public transportation in Taiwan have highlighted the need for clearer guidelines and better public understanding of their purpose. While the “People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act” 26 the provision of priority seats on public transportation, the law does not specify who is eligible to 27 them. Despite the frequent news of people fighting over priority seats, the Welfare Ministry in Taiwan has stated that priority seats will not be abolished, but 28 to the law may be considered. In the face of recent controversies, it’s about time to consider expanding the definition of “those with actual needs” to include more groups, which has been proposed but was not passed by the previous legislature. In addition to top-down legal regulations, it is also important to 29 a spirit of mutual understanding from the bottom up through public education. Everyone needs to learn to identify who is most in need, and should not hastily judge who is eligible to sit in priority seating based solely on age and appearance. To better avoid unnecessary conflicts and misunderstandings, clearer guidelines, public education, and a spirit of mutual respect among passengers are all 30 . Only through collective effort can we create a more inclusive and considerate public transportation environment.
The recent controversies surrounding priority seats on public transportation in Taiwan have highlighted the need for clearer guidelines and better public understanding of their purpose. While the “People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act” 26 the provision of priority seats on public transportation, the law does not specify who is eligible to 27 them. Despite the frequent news of people fighting over priority seats, the Welfare Ministry in Taiwan has stated that priority seats will not be abolished, but 28 to the law may be considered. In the face of recent controversies, it’s about time to consider expanding the definition of “those with actual needs” to include more groups, which has been proposed but was not passed by the previous legislature. In addition to top-down legal regulations, it is also important to 29 a spirit of mutual understanding from the bottom up through public education. Everyone needs to learn to identify who is most in need, and should not hastily judge who is eligible to sit in priority seating based solely on age and appearance. To better avoid unnecessary conflicts and misunderstandings, clearer guidelines, public education, and a spirit of mutual respect among passengers are all 30 . Only through collective effort can we create a more inclusive and considerate public transportation environment.
27
- A access
- B possess
- C acquire
- D own
思路引導 VIP
想像你在圖書館看到一個空位。法律或規範通常是在規定誰有權利「坐下來使用」它，還是規定誰能把那個座位「買回家變成私人財產」？請思考哪一個概念最能表達「獲取公共服務的使用權限」而非「擁有物品」？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你的觀察力非常敏銳
- 觀念驗證：這題考查的是動詞辨析與語境結合。選項中的 access 在此處意為「使用、進入的權限」。在公共運輸的語境下，博愛座屬於公共設施，法律規範的是誰具備「使用的資格」，而非將座位「永久佔有」或「買下」。其餘選項如 possess、acquire、own 均帶有較強的「持有、擁有產權」之意，不符合公共設施的性質。
- 難度點評：本題難度為 medium。這類題目具備良好的鑑別度，因為學生必須在「中文意思相近」的單字中，透過語境（Context）分析出「使用權」與「所有權」的邏輯差異，這是邁向高階英文學習的關鍵步。