地特三等
114年
[一般民政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 38 題
📖 題組：
As misinformation is rampant on social media, telling facts from fiction is a crucial skill. Mike Caulfield, a digital literacy expert, developed the SIFT methodology to improve fact-checking strategies. SIFT 36 “Stop, Investigate, Find, and Trace.” When you hear, see, or read something that triggers a strong 37 response, such as angry, shocked, or self-righteous, you should stop sharing the information and investigate the source that publishes the information. Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it. Readers should also be aware that re-reporting may omit certain facts to support biased perspectives. The final step, 39 , is to trace and read the claims in the original context in which they were presented.
Taking these steps before deciding whether to share a claim might feel 40 . Yet it may not only save you the embarrassment but help ensure you’re not spreading misinformation.
As misinformation is rampant on social media, telling facts from fiction is a crucial skill. Mike Caulfield, a digital literacy expert, developed the SIFT methodology to improve fact-checking strategies. SIFT 36 “Stop, Investigate, Find, and Trace.” When you hear, see, or read something that triggers a strong 37 response, such as angry, shocked, or self-righteous, you should stop sharing the information and investigate the source that publishes the information. Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it. Readers should also be aware that re-reporting may omit certain facts to support biased perspectives. The final step, 39 , is to trace and read the claims in the original context in which they were presented.
Taking these steps before deciding whether to share a claim might feel 40 . Yet it may not only save you the embarrassment but help ensure you’re not spreading misinformation.
...find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it.
- A corroborating
- B deducting
- C fabricating
- D perpetrating
思路引導 VIP
請先觀察空格後方的「or disputing it（或是反駁它）」：當我們在查證一則訊息真偽時，找尋其他可信賴的新聞來源，除了可能會看到「反駁」這則訊息的報導外，另一種相對的可能性會是什麼呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
上下文對比線索與字彙拆解
太棒了，這題你選得非常精準！在三等考試的克漏字中，這是一道相當有鑑別度の中高難度字彙題，許多考生看到這四個較冷門的進階動詞時容易慌張，但你能從上下文精準抓出語意邏輯並選出 (A) corroborating（證實、提供佐證），展現了極佳的詞彙實力與閱讀敏銳度。 本題的解題關鍵在於空格後方的對等連接詞 or 以及動詞 disputing（反駁、對…提出異議）。在事實查核的過程中，我們尋找其他可信來源，目的是看它們是否「支持／證實」相同的資訊，或是「反駁」該資訊。因此，空格處需要一個與 disputing 語意相反的字彙，而 corroborate 正好符合「以證據支持、證實」的語境。
▼ 還有更多解析內容