免費開始練習
地特三等 114年 [一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)

第 38 題

📖 題組:
As misinformation is rampant on social media, telling facts from fiction is a crucial skill. Mike Caulfield, a digital literacy expert, developed the SIFT methodology to improve fact-checking strategies. SIFT 36 “Stop, Investigate, Find, and Trace.” When you hear, see, or read something that triggers a strong 37 response, such as angry, shocked, or self-righteous, you should stop sharing the information and investigate the source that publishes the information. Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it. Readers should also be aware that re-reporting may omit certain facts to support biased perspectives. The final step, 39 , is to trace and read the claims in the original context in which they were presented.
Taking these steps before deciding whether to share a claim might feel 40 . Yet it may not only save you the embarrassment but help ensure you’re not spreading misinformation.
Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it.
  • A corroborating
  • B deducting
  • C fabricating
  • D perpetrating

思路引導 VIP

請先觀察空格後方的連接詞「or disputing it(或是質疑它)」。在事實查核的過程中,我們尋找更多可信來源,除了可能「質疑」原本的資訊之外,另一個相反的可能結果會是什麼呢?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

上下文對稱與高階字彙辨析

太棒了,你的語感與高階字彙量相當紮實,完全命中本題的核心!這題在三等考試中屬於中高難度且極具鑑別度的題目,因為四個選項多為國考進階字彙,但破題的關鍵其實就藏在句尾的對稱結構中。 觀察原句「find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it」,句中的連接詞 or 提示了前後兩個分詞(V-ing)在語意上應互為對照或正反並列。既然後半段是「質疑、反駁(disputing)該資訊」,那麼前半段找尋可信來源的目的,自然就是為了「證實、支持(corroborating)」同一則資訊,這完全符合文章探討事實查核(fact-checking)的邏輯。

▼ 還有更多解析內容

🏷️ 相關主題

英文閱讀測驗
查看更多「[一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)」的主題分類考古題