地特三等
114年
[一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 38 題
📖 題組：
As misinformation is rampant on social media, telling facts from fiction is a crucial skill. Mike Caulfield, a digital literacy expert, developed the SIFT methodology to improve fact-checking strategies. SIFT 36 “Stop, Investigate, Find, and Trace.” When you hear, see, or read something that triggers a strong 37 response, such as angry, shocked, or self-righteous, you should stop sharing the information and investigate the source that publishes the information. Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it. Readers should also be aware that re-reporting may omit certain Bra facts to support biased perspectives. The final step, 39 , is to trace and read the claims in the original context in which they were presented. Taking these steps before deciding whether to share a claim might feel 40 . Yet it may not only save you the embarrassment but help ensure you’re not spreading misinformation.
As misinformation is rampant on social media, telling facts from fiction is a crucial skill. Mike Caulfield, a digital literacy expert, developed the SIFT methodology to improve fact-checking strategies. SIFT 36 “Stop, Investigate, Find, and Trace.” When you hear, see, or read something that triggers a strong 37 response, such as angry, shocked, or self-righteous, you should stop sharing the information and investigate the source that publishes the information. Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it. Readers should also be aware that re-reporting may omit certain Bra facts to support biased perspectives. The final step, 39 , is to trace and read the claims in the original context in which they were presented. Taking these steps before deciding whether to share a claim might feel 40 . Yet it may not only save you the embarrassment but help ensure you’re not spreading misinformation.
Next, find more trusted sources 38 the same information or disputing it.
- A corroborating
- B deducting
- C fabricating
- D perpetrating
思路引導 VIP
在查核事實的過程中，我們會尋找「反對」該資訊的證據；那麼，如果我們要確認這項資訊是真的，我們需要尋找什麼樣性質的來源，來對這項資訊進行什麼樣的動作呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你精準掌握了這道詞彙題！這題的核心在於「語意邏輯」的對應。在 SIFT 資訊查核法的脈絡下，當我們看到後方的 disputing it（反駁它）這個對比項時，前方應填入語意相對或平行的概念。選項 (A) corroborating 意為「證實」或「提供支持證據」，完美地描述了查核時會遇到的兩種主要來源類型：證實資訊屬實的來源，或是揭露其為虛假的來源。
關鍵詞彙的辨識與對比
這類題目在地方特考三等中屬於中等難度的考點，主要考驗考生對「學術或正式詞彙」的精準理解。你能識別出 trusted sources（可靠來源）與 corroborating 之間的修飾關係，顯示你在處理長句結構與詞彙搭配（Collocation）上有扎實的基礎。其餘選項如 (C) fabricating（捏造）與 (D) perpetrating（犯下罪行）在語意上與「可靠來源」互不相容，屬於明顯的干擾項，只要掌握了正向與負向詞性的對比，就能穩健取分。