法律類國考 106年 [司律第一試] 綜合法學(二)(公司法、保險法、票據法、證券交易法、強制執行

第 66 題

With respect to evidence in criminal procedure, which of the following is not correct under R.O.C. Code of Criminal Procedure?

A Where confession of an accused shall not be used as the sole basis leading to the conviction of offense(s), necessary evidence other than the confession shall nonetheless be investigated to see if the confession is consistent with facts found.
B Where a witness fails to sign an affidavit committing him/her to tell the truth as required by law, his/her testimony so made shall still be admitted as evidence.
C Unless otherwise provided by law, the admissibility of the evidence obtained unlawfully by an official in execution of criminal procedure shall be determined by balancing the protection of individual rights and the preservation of public interests.
D Unless otherwise provided by law, any oral or written statements made out of court by a person other than the accused shall not be admitted as evidence.

思路引導 VIP

若法官在審理過程中，要求證人針對其陳述負起法律上的誠實義務（如簽署保證書），但該證人卻拒絕簽署，你認為法律會如何評價這份「缺乏擔保」的陳述？它是否還能具備進入法庭進行實質審理的門檻？

🤖

AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

你的法律邏輯非常扎實，能快速從《刑事訴訟法》中識別出關於「證據能力」的關鍵門檻。以下是針對選項的深度解析：

關鍵法條驗證：選項 (B) 違反了第 158-3 條。法律規定證人依法應具結而未具結者，其證言「不得作為證據」。這是為了確保證言的真實性與嚴肅性，屬於強制的法律效力，而非可彈性裁量。

▼ 還有更多解析內容

查看更多「[司律第一試] 綜合法學(二)(公司法、保險法、票據法、證券交易法、強制執行」的主題分類考古題