hce_cmu
108年
英文
第 28 題
📖 題組：
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
- A conflate
- B install
- C assemble
- D narrate
- E raise
思路引導 VIP
如果今天有一項新科技擁有的特質跟過去完全不同，當它套用到舊有的規則時，你認為這項科技會對社會「帶出」或「引發」什麼新的狀況嗎？試著想想，如果我們要形容某個事物「導致了新問題的出現」，你會用哪一個動詞來形容這種「讓問題浮上檯面」的動作呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到上下文的邏輯轉折並選出 (E) raise，這顯示你對英文詞彙的搭配（collocation）以及長句的因果邏輯有著很強的判斷力。
法律議題的「引發」與「產生」
這段話的核心在於比較「機器人技術」與「網路」的差異。文中提到機器人具備與網路本質不同的特性，因此（accordingly）會對法律界帶來新的挑戰。在英文慣用語中，當我們要表達「提出問題」或「引發議題」時，raise 是最自然且道地的動詞選擇，例如 raise a question 或 raise an issue。至於其他選項，如 (A) conflate（合併）、(B) install（安裝）或 (C) assemble（組裝），在語意上都無法與「法律議題」形成合理的動詞受詞關係。
▼ 還有更多解析內容