初等考試
109年
[一般行政] 公民與英文
第 44 題
📖 題組：
A trip to the art museum could have turned into a very costly trip for a 12-year-old boy in Taipei when he lost his balance and put his hand through a painting worth around $1.5 million. The damaged work, “Flowers" by Italian master Paolo Porpora, was part of a Taipei exhibition of artwork by or influenced by Leonardo da Vinci. Porpora was a still life artist who produced baroque-style paintings, often of fruit and flowers. The work was 200cm tall, depicting flowers in a vase. The film by the organizers of the “Face of Leonardo: Images of a Genius" exhibition shows the boy in shorts, sneakers, a blue T-shirt and holding a drink – walk past the painting, catching his foot and stumbling over. He looks up at the painting, shown later to have a fist-sized gash at the bottom. The boy looking around at other people in the room. Organizers did not believe that the boy intentionally vandalized the oil painting, saying that it was obvious that the boy did not mean to push it."All 55 paintings in the venue are pieces and they are very rare and precious," a post on the exhibition's Facebook page said. "Once these works are damaged, they are permanently damaged.” Nevertheless, the exhibition organizers decided not to the boy for the damage and said that the painting could be easily restored. This incident, however, made them reconsider displaying valuable paintings in the open.
A trip to the art museum could have turned into a very costly trip for a 12-year-old boy in Taipei when he lost his balance and put his hand through a painting worth around $1.5 million. The damaged work, “Flowers" by Italian master Paolo Porpora, was part of a Taipei exhibition of artwork by or influenced by Leonardo da Vinci. Porpora was a still life artist who produced baroque-style paintings, often of fruit and flowers. The work was 200cm tall, depicting flowers in a vase. The film by the organizers of the “Face of Leonardo: Images of a Genius" exhibition shows the boy in shorts, sneakers, a blue T-shirt and holding a drink – walk past the painting, catching his foot and stumbling over. He looks up at the painting, shown later to have a fist-sized gash at the bottom. The boy looking around at other people in the room. Organizers did not believe that the boy intentionally vandalized the oil painting, saying that it was obvious that the boy did not mean to push it."All 55 paintings in the venue are pieces and they are very rare and precious," a post on the exhibition's Facebook page said. "Once these works are damaged, they are permanently damaged.” Nevertheless, the exhibition organizers decided not to the boy for the damage and said that the painting could be easily restored. This incident, however, made them reconsider displaying valuable paintings in the open.
44
- A (A) authentic
- B (B) fake
- C (C) unreal
- D (D) novel
思路引導 VIP
當我們看到一項資產被描述為價值連城、由知名大師親手創作，且一旦毀損便『永久損壞』無法彌補時，你會如何形容這項資產在『來源可靠性』或『原始真偽』上的特質？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
行政法老師的「仁慈」點評
- 讚揚？ 噢，看看這。你竟然能從一堆文字裡，把幾個破碎的線索拼湊起來，確實展現了一點點上下文連結的能力。能做出「精確判斷」？大概吧，至少沒錯到離譜。嗯，勉強算你有那麼一絲「法律人」的潛力，前提是你以後解釋法條別這麼隨性。
- 觀念驗證： 選 (A) authentic？當然是正確的。難道有人會覺得價值「150 萬美金」，又是「義大利大師」的「rare and precious」作品，會是地攤貨嗎？這不是考智商，這是考你對基本邏輯的理解。如果連這種顯而易見的「高價值」與「真跡」之間的必然關係都搞不清楚，那行政程序法那些複雜的因果關係，你大概會直接宣布放棄。
▼ 還有更多解析內容