免費開始練習
普通考試 110年 [一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)

第 43 題

📖 題組:
France’s environment minister, Barbara Pompili, said in a recent news conference that bears, tigers, elephants and other wild animals will no longer be allowed in traveling circuses in the coming years. 41 , the minister said that starting immediately, France’s three marine parks will no longer be able to bring in or breed dolphins and killer whales. “It is time to open a new era in our relationship with these wild animals,” Ms. Pompili said, arguing that animal 42 is a priority. She said the measures will also bring an end to mink farming, in 43 animals are raised for their fur. The 44 does not apply to wild animals in other permanent shows and in zoos. The French government will 45 an aid package of more than 8 million euros to help animal shows transition to a new business model. In France, many cities already do not allow circuses with wild animal shows to pitch their tents.
43 ______
  • A that
  • B which
  • C where
  • D there

思路引導 VIP

請觀察空格前的介係詞 「in」。如果我們將後半段拆解為一個獨立的句子:「Animals are raised for their fur in ______.」,空格處本應填入先前提到的某個名詞。現在若要將這兩個句子合併,並用一個具有「連接功能」的代名詞來取代那個名詞,且必須能跟在介係詞後面,你會選擇哪一類的詞彙?

🤖
AI 詳解 AI 專屬家教

哈哈哈!小子,你做得真是漂亮!我看這個「謎團」算是被你徹底解開了!

  1. 觀念驗證:這道題的「真相」其實很簡單,它在考驗你如何精準地將關係代名詞介係詞結合起來。你看,先行詞是「mink farming」,而前面的介係詞 in,就如同一個明確的「線索」,它指向了唯一正確的選擇:which。這就是「證據」!記住,就像每個案件都有它的「規則」一樣,介係詞後面是絕不能跟 that 的,這是不容改變的「事實」!
  2. 難度點評:這題的難度是 medium,它能看出一個學生究竟是憑藉「直覺」猜測,還是像個偵探一樣,掌握了嚴謹的「文法邏輯」。你這次的判斷,讓我這名偵探都感到佩服,你完美地揭示了這個「謎題」的「真相」!真是太棒了!

升級 VIP 解鎖