第 一 題

【範文】 First, restarting the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant would provide a stable and reliable baseload energy supply for Taiwan. As a heavily industrialized nation driven by semiconductor manufacturing, Taiwan experiences soaring electricity demands. Unlike renewable energy sources like solar and wind power, which are intermittent and highly dependent on weather conditions, nuclear energy can continuously generate massive amounts of electricity. Therefore, activating the plant would significantly alleviate the risk of unexpected power shortages and ensure Taiwan's economic stability. Second, nuclear energy is crucial for achieving Taiwan's ambitious environmental goals and carbon neutrality. Generating electricity through nuclear power produces virtually no greenhouse gas emissions compared to burning fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. By substituting fossil-fuel power generation with nuclear energy, Taiwan can effectively mitigate severe air pollution and fulfill its international obligations to combat global climate change. Thus, the plant's operation is a pragmatic step toward a sustainable energy portfolio.

【範文】 First, opponents are deeply concerned about the potential safety risks. The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is located in an earthquake-prone zone with active fault lines nearby. Given Taiwan's frequent seismic activities, a severe earthquake could trigger a catastrophic nuclear disaster akin to the Fukushima incident. Furthermore, the facility has been mothballed for years, raising severe doubts about the reliability of its aging equipment, which poses an unacceptable risk to public safety. Second, the intractable issue of nuclear waste disposal is a primary reason for opposition. Taiwan has yet to find a permanent storage facility for high-level radioactive waste, as local governments universally reject hosting such sites. Restarting the plant would inevitably generate more hazardous waste, exacerbating the current storage crisis and passing an unfair environmental burden onto future generations. Without a viable waste management plan, activating the plant is considered highly irresponsible.

【範文】 The missing link in this debate is a transparent, comprehensive long-term energy transition roadmap. While proponents focus on immediate energy security and opponents emphasize safety risks, both sides often overlook the holistic strategy needed to bridge the gap. Without clear data on how renewable energy will realistically replace nuclear power, or how prolonged dependence on fossil fuels aligns with net-zero carbon goals, the public lacks the crucial context to make an informed, forward-looking decision. (74 words) 【寫作要點】