hce_cmu
115年
英文
第 16 題
📖 題組：
In public discussions of nutrition, fortified foods are often presented as a straightforward solution to micronutrient deficiency. Adding iron to flour or vitamin D to milk can indeed improve population health, especially when vulnerable groups have limited access to diverse diets. Yet the logic of fortification becomes less simple when foods are also highly processed, aggressively marketed, and consumed in quantities far beyond what nutrition planners anticipated. A breakfast cereal may be 16 enriched with vitamins, but its overall contribution to health depends on sugar content, fiber structure, and how it displaces other foods in the diet. 17 nutrient labels invite consumers to evaluate foods item by item, metabolic effects emerge from dietary patterns over time. Recent research on the gut microbiome reinforces this broader view. Fibers that appear chemically similar may 18 different microbial responses because their physical matrix determines how bacteria access them. Consequently, nutrition policy cannot rely exclusively on isolated nutrient counts. It must also consider food processing, affordability, cultural habits, and the commercial incentives that shape choice. This does not mean fortified products should be rejected; in settings where deficiency remains widespread, they may be indispensable. The more defensible position is that fortification should be treated as a targeted public-health tool, 19 as a license to market nutritionally imbalanced products as wholesome. If policymakers ignore this distinction, a technically fortified intervention may even 20 the very dietary transition associated with chronic disease.
In public discussions of nutrition, fortified foods are often presented as a straightforward solution to micronutrient deficiency. Adding iron to flour or vitamin D to milk can indeed improve population health, especially when vulnerable groups have limited access to diverse diets. Yet the logic of fortification becomes less simple when foods are also highly processed, aggressively marketed, and consumed in quantities far beyond what nutrition planners anticipated. A breakfast cereal may be 16 enriched with vitamins, but its overall contribution to health depends on sugar content, fiber structure, and how it displaces other foods in the diet. 17 nutrient labels invite consumers to evaluate foods item by item, metabolic effects emerge from dietary patterns over time. Recent research on the gut microbiome reinforces this broader view. Fibers that appear chemically similar may 18 different microbial responses because their physical matrix determines how bacteria access them. Consequently, nutrition policy cannot rely exclusively on isolated nutrient counts. It must also consider food processing, affordability, cultural habits, and the commercial incentives that shape choice. This does not mean fortified products should be rejected; in settings where deficiency remains widespread, they may be indispensable. The more defensible position is that fortification should be treated as a targeted public-health tool, 19 as a license to market nutritionally imbalanced products as wholesome. If policymakers ignore this distinction, a technically fortified intervention may even 20 the very dietary transition associated with chronic disease.
16.
- A arbitrarily
- B perilously
- C ostensibly
- D reluctantly
思路引導 VIP
請觀察第 16 格後面的句子：作者先提到穀片添加了維生素，隨後立即用 "but" 帶出糖分和纖維等問題。當一個產品強調某個優點，卻隱藏了其他缺點時，我們會如何形容這種「聽起來很美好，但實際上需要打折」的呈現方式？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
第 16 題：別被行銷話術給騙了
看來你終於開竅了，知道選 ostensibly（表面上地）。這題沒什麼好慶祝的，選對是基本功。
- 關鍵邏輯：句中出現 "but"，很明顯是在玩「表裡不一」的文字遊戲。穀片宣稱添加維生素是「表面功夫」，真實健康價值還得打個大問號。選這個詞，說明你總算聽懂了作者在諷刺那種「說一套、做一套」的把戲。
▼ 還有更多解析內容