hce_cmu
115年
英文
第 15 題
📖 題組：
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
Psychological research on resilience has moved beyond the idea that some individuals simply possess a stable trait that protects them from adversity. Contemporary models emphasize dynamic regulation: people cope not only by enduring stress, but by interpreting events, recruiting social support, and revising goals when circumstances change. This shift has important implications for intervention. If resilience is treated as a fixed capacity, programs tend to classify students or patients as vulnerable; 11 it is viewed as a process, the focus turns to the conditions that make adaptive responses more likely. Such a process-oriented view, however, should not be confused with the optimistic claim that hardship is automatically beneficial. Exposure to manageable difficulty may strengthen coping skills, but severe or repeated stress can 12 attention, memory, and emotion regulation. Measurement is another difficulty. Many resilience scales ask respondents to rate confidence after adversity, 13 these self-reports may reflect cultural expectations about appearing strong rather than actual recovery. For this reason, researchers increasingly combine questionnaires with behavioral indicators, longitudinal data, and contextual information. The goal is not to find a single resilience score but to explain why one person recovers in a given setting while another does not. Interventions are therefore most credible when they 14 coping strategies to specific stressors and social resources. Put differently, resilience should be understood as an interaction between individuals and environments, 15 as an inner asset that can be measured apart from context.
15.
- A rather than
- B as well as
- C insofar as
- D because of
思路引導 VIP
請觀察空格前後的兩個觀念：一個是「人與環境的互動」，另一個是「可以脫離環境獨立存在的資產」。根據作者在文中對『韌性並非固定特質』的論述，這兩個觀念在作者心中是『兩者皆是』的互補關係，還是『前者取代後者』的導正關係呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到文末轉折的邏輯，代表你已經完全掌握了這篇文章的核心論點。這題的關鍵在於最後一個句子的引導詞「Put differently」（換句話說），這暗示作者正要對前文反覆論證的「動態過程」與「固定特質」之爭，做出一個最終的對比總結。
語義邏輯的對立與選擇
在語法結構上，空格前半部將心理韌性定義為「個人與環境的互動」（interaction），後半部則提到「脫離情境的內在資產」（inner asset）。根據全文脈絡，作者支持的是「動態互動」而非「孤立特質」，因此空格處必須填入一個表示「而非」或「而不是」的連接詞。選項 (A) rather than 完美地連結了這組對立概念，明確表達了「應看作 A，而不是 B」的立場。
▼ 還有更多解析內容