hce_tcu
115年
英文
第 33 題
📖 題組：
In recent years, mindfulness practices have gained widespread popularity as tools for managing stress, enhancing emotional regulation, and improving overall mental health. Originating from ancient contemplative traditions, particularly within Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness was historically embedded in a broader ethical and spiritual framework emphasizing compassion, self-awareness, and moral responsibility. In contemporary society, however, these practices have increasingly been adapted into secular programs designed for mass consumption. As a result, mindfulness is now commonly incorporated into clinical therapies, educational curricula, and corporate wellness initiatives. Proponents argue that such adaptations have made mindfulness more accessible, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to benefit from its stress-reducing and attention-enhancing effects. Empirical studies have indeed demonstrated positive outcomes, including reduced anxiety, improved focus, and greater emotional resilience among practitioners. Nevertheless, critics caution that this widespread adoption risks transforming mindfulness into a commodified self-improvement technique. When stripped of its ethical foundations, mindfulness may be reduced to a productivity-enhancing tool that serves organizational efficiency rather than individual well-being. In corporate settings, for instance, mindfulness training is sometimes promoted as a means to help employees cope with excessive workloads, thereby shifting responsibility away from systemic issues such as burnout and workplace exploitation. According to these critics, such instrumentalization undermines the original intent of mindfulness by prioritizing performance over reflection and ethical growth. They argue that without an accompanying emphasis on values such as empathy and social responsibility, mindfulness programs may inadvertently reinforce the very stressors they claim to alleviate. ___, the debate surrounding modern mindfulness practices centers not on their effectiveness, but on the purposes they ultimately serve.
In recent years, mindfulness practices have gained widespread popularity as tools for managing stress, enhancing emotional regulation, and improving overall mental health. Originating from ancient contemplative traditions, particularly within Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness was historically embedded in a broader ethical and spiritual framework emphasizing compassion, self-awareness, and moral responsibility. In contemporary society, however, these practices have increasingly been adapted into secular programs designed for mass consumption. As a result, mindfulness is now commonly incorporated into clinical therapies, educational curricula, and corporate wellness initiatives. Proponents argue that such adaptations have made mindfulness more accessible, allowing individuals from diverse backgrounds to benefit from its stress-reducing and attention-enhancing effects. Empirical studies have indeed demonstrated positive outcomes, including reduced anxiety, improved focus, and greater emotional resilience among practitioners. Nevertheless, critics caution that this widespread adoption risks transforming mindfulness into a commodified self-improvement technique. When stripped of its ethical foundations, mindfulness may be reduced to a productivity-enhancing tool that serves organizational efficiency rather than individual well-being. In corporate settings, for instance, mindfulness training is sometimes promoted as a means to help employees cope with excessive workloads, thereby shifting responsibility away from systemic issues such as burnout and workplace exploitation. According to these critics, such instrumentalization undermines the original intent of mindfulness by prioritizing performance over reflection and ethical growth. They argue that without an accompanying emphasis on values such as empathy and social responsibility, mindfulness programs may inadvertently reinforce the very stressors they claim to alleviate. ___, the debate surrounding modern mindfulness practices centers not on their effectiveness, but on the purposes they ultimately serve.
It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes mindfulness ___.
- A is ineffective outside religious contexts
- B requires ethical grounding to preserve its original intent
- C should be restricted to clinical settings
- D inevitably leads to corporate exploitation
思路引導 VIP
請觀察文章第三段，當正念被應用在現代企業環境中時，批評者認為它被「剝離（stripped of）」了什麼重要的元素？而這個元素的缺失，又會如何改變正念原本存在的目的呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你準確掌握了這篇文章的核心命題！你能從字裡行間讀出作者對當前趨勢的微言大義，展現了優異的閱讀理解實力。
核心觀念：倫理框架的重要性
這道題目的關鍵在於理解正念（Mindfulness）的本質變遷。文章強調，正念最初是深植於一個強調慈悲與道德責任的「倫理與精神框架」中。雖然現代世俗化的應用讓更多人獲益，但作者透過引述評論者的觀點，表達了對「去倫理化」的憂慮。當正念被剝離了原本的倫理基礎，它可能從一種精神修煉轉向單純提高生產力的工具。因此，選項 (B) 提到的**倫理根基（Ethical grounding）**正是保留其原始意圖（Original intent）的關鍵所在。
▼ 還有更多解析內容