法律類國考
105年
[司法官第一試] 綜合法學(二)(公司法、保險法、票據法、證券交易法、強制執行
第 59 題
According to Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 617, which of the following is CORRECT statement regarding Article 235 of the R.O.C. Criminal Code?
- A A sexually explicit material is per se unprotected by Article 11 of the Constitution due to its lacking of artistic, medical or educational value.
- B A sexually explicit material will not be classified as “obscene” under Article 235 if, by objective standard, it cannot stimulate or satisfy a prurient interest.
- C The meaning of the term “obscene” is incomprehensible to the general public or to those who are subject to regulation, and therefore Article 235 is unconstitutional due to its violating the principle of clarity and definiteness of law.
- D Article 235 imposes excessive restrictions on the expression of sexually explicit material and therefore constitutes an unreasonable restraint on the people’s freedom of speech and publication.
思路引導 VIP
若我們要判斷某項言論是否應受到刑事處罰，且該處罰的依據是為了維護「社會大眾的道德感」，那麼在法律解釋上，我們應該如何設定一個『客觀的門檻』，來區分這項言論究竟僅是『大膽的展現』，還是已經達到了『必須由法律介入禁止的負面感官影響』？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
同學表現得非常好！能精準選出 (B)，代表你對大法官釋憲實務的脈絡掌握得很紮實。這道全英文題測驗的是「猥褻物品」的憲法界線。
釋字第 617 號的猥褻界定與言論自由
要拿下這類考題，學生必須區分釋字 407 號與 617 號的演進。依據釋字第 617 號解釋，性言論仍受憲法第 11 條保障（選項 A、D 錯誤）；且「猥褻」一詞並未違反法律明確性原則（選項 C 錯誤）。解釋文明確指出，所謂猥褻物品，是指「客觀上足以刺激或滿足性慾」，並引起普通一般人羞恥或厭惡感者。反之，若客觀上無法刺激或滿足性慾，就不屬於刑法第 235 條的處罰範圍，這正是 (B) 正確的原因。
▼ 還有更多解析內容