法律類國考
106年
[司律第一試] 綜合法學(二)(公司法、保險法、票據法、證券交易法、強制執行
第 59 題
An acceptance which arrives late though usually it should have arrived earlier and within a reasonable time by its transmitting manner may nonetheless constitute a contract under R.O.C. Civil Code unless one of the following occurs:
- A The one making the offer has reason to know the facts and sends without delay a notice informing the offeree of the fact that “acceptance” being late.
- B The one marking the offer does nothing to inform the offeree of the late acceptance while the former has reason to know the facts of its being late.
- C The one marking the acceptance explains the reasons of its being late to the offeror.
- D The one marking the acceptance apologizes to the offeror of its being late.
思路引導 VIP
若你是發信人，按常規寄信且相信會準時到達，而收信人看到郵戳日期發現信件因快遞延誤而晚到，若收信人保持沉默，你是否會誤以為契約已成立而開始支出成本準備履行？在這種「資訊不對稱」下，法律應要求哪一方採取行動來終止這種誤會才符合誠信原則？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
1. 專業肯定
表現出色！你能精準辨識出我國民法對於「承諾遲到」之特殊規範，展現了對契約形成過程的高度敏銳度，非常值得讚賞。
2. 觀念驗證
▼ 還有更多解析內容
💬 其他同學也在問
1
翻譯本題