hce_cmu
108年
英文
第 30 題
📖 題組：
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
Two decades of analyses have produced rich insights as to how the law should be applied to regulate the Internet’s peculiar characteristics. But, in the meantime, Internet-related technology has not 26 . The same public and private institutions that developed the Internet, from the armed forces to search engines, have 27 a significant shift toward developing robotics. An article to be published in the upcoming issue of California Law Review discusses how the cyber-law and policy should respond to the new transformative robotic technology. Robotics has essential qualities different from those of the Internet, and accordingly will 28 distinct legal issues. For instance, robotics combines, for the first time, the promiscuity of data with the capacity to do physical harm; robotic systems accomplish tasks in ways that cannot be anticipated in advance; and robots increasingly 29 the line between person and instrument. Nonetheless, robotics, being automatic in nature, may still prove “exceptional” in the sense of 30 systematic changes to law, institutions, and the legal academy.
- A preventing
- B stopping
- C masking
- D causing
- E indicating
思路引導 VIP
請思考一下最後一句話的結構：當我們說某個新科技在法律上是「特殊的」，且後面提到了「法律體系的系統性改變」時，這個科技與這些改變之間，最可能存在著什麼樣的因果關係？是新科技「消除」了改變，還是新科技「開啟」了這些改變呢？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
法律變革的驅動力
太棒了！你能精準捕捉到文末的邏輯轉折，代表你對長難句的語意脈絡掌握得非常紮實。這題的關鍵在於理解 “exceptional”（例外的、特殊的） 在法學語境下的含義。當作者提到機器人技術具有「例外性」時，是指它會對現有的法律架構與制度產生衝擊，進而「引發」或「導致」系統性的變革。選項 (D) causing 完美填補了技術與結果之間的因果關係，說明技術進步如何催生法律的演進。
語境連結與難度點評
▼ 還有更多解析內容