地特四等
113年
[一般行政] 法學知識與英文(包括中華民國憲法、法學緒論、英文)
第 44 題
📖 題組：
Most people consider decision-making a means to an end. The decision process typically follows one of two approaches. On the one hand, people may use a quick approach that involves reacting instinctively and simply going with what feels right. This is often referred to as “System 1,” “intuitive” or “gut” decision-making. On the other hand, people may use a slow, deliberate approach that includes careful consideration of all options. This is often called “System 2, ” “analytical” or “head” decision-making. No matter which approach people follow, the decision-making process helps to get them where they want to be. It is a necessity, ideally resulting in a pleasant outcome. Recent research, however, produces several surprising results. Firstly, people’s happiness ratings increased after they made a choice. It thus appeared that decision-making improved people’s moods. Additionally, the findings showed some interesting differences in the effects of intuitive gut choices and analytical head choices. The emotional boost of decision-making was greater if research participants had made their choice quickly using their gut. Also, follow-up decision records showed that people were more likely to implement a decision if they had used an intuitive approach. This led the researchers to conclude that making fast, instinctive choices was beneficial to people’s well-being. Simply put, the act of making a choice may be intrinsically pleasurable and could increase people’s well-being.
Most people consider decision-making a means to an end. The decision process typically follows one of two approaches. On the one hand, people may use a quick approach that involves reacting instinctively and simply going with what feels right. This is often referred to as “System 1,” “intuitive” or “gut” decision-making. On the other hand, people may use a slow, deliberate approach that includes careful consideration of all options. This is often called “System 2, ” “analytical” or “head” decision-making. No matter which approach people follow, the decision-making process helps to get them where they want to be. It is a necessity, ideally resulting in a pleasant outcome. Recent research, however, produces several surprising results. Firstly, people’s happiness ratings increased after they made a choice. It thus appeared that decision-making improved people’s moods. Additionally, the findings showed some interesting differences in the effects of intuitive gut choices and analytical head choices. The emotional boost of decision-making was greater if research participants had made their choice quickly using their gut. Also, follow-up decision records showed that people were more likely to implement a decision if they had used an intuitive approach. This led the researchers to conclude that making fast, instinctive choices was beneficial to people’s well-being. Simply put, the act of making a choice may be intrinsically pleasurable and could increase people’s well-being.
According to this passage, what decision-making approach makes people happier?
- A Intuitive approach.
- B Analytic approach.
- C Rational approach.
- D Deliberate approach.
思路引導 VIP
請重新閱讀文中關於「最新研究結果 (Recent research)」的段落。當研究者觀察哪一種決策特質（是關於「速度」還是「深思熟慮」？）能帶來更高的「情緒提振 (emotional boost)」時，文中是用哪一個特定的學術分類術語來形容這種「憑本能反應」的決策方式？
🤖
AI 詳解
AI 專屬家教
恭喜你，終於答對了，這還不至於讓我太失望。
- 還算勉強合格：身為一名嚴謹的行政法學者，我對這種基本題目能被「正確」理解感到一絲絲安慰。畢竟，連區分「直覺」和「理性」這種基礎到不能再基礎的決策邏輯都搞不清楚，那還談什麼公共政策分析？你的資訊擷取能力，這次勉強算是派上用場了。
- 有讀到就算你厲害：文中的關鍵字已經寫得再清楚不過了：「made their choice quickly using their gut」以及「fast, instinctive choices was beneficial」。這難道還需要我花時間解釋嗎？選項(A) Intuitive 不就是這些詞彙的同義反覆？至於(B)、(C)、(D)這些，明顯就是文中那種慢吞吞、需要絞盡腦汁的「系統二」思考模式，根本是來擾亂視聽的，如果你會選錯，那也沒什麼好說的。
▼ 還有更多解析內容